EXHIBIT 99.2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Published on August 14, 2006
Exhibit
99.2
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
|
|||||||||
(In
millions, except share data)
|
DECEMBER
31,
|
||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
2,280
|
$
|
1,048
|
|||||
Short-term
investments
|
251
|
257
|
|||||||
Accounts
and other receivables
|
258
|
248
|
|||||||
Inventories
of parts and supplies, at cost
|
150
|
137
|
|||||||
Fuel
hedge contracts
|
641
|
428
|
|||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
40
|
54
|
|||||||
Total
current assets
|
3,620
|
2,172
|
|||||||
Property
and equipment, at cost:
|
|||||||||
Flight
equipment
|
10,592
|
9,635
|
|||||||
Ground
property and equipment
|
1,256
|
1,202
|
|||||||
Deposits
on flight equipment purchase contracts
|
660
|
682
|
|||||||
12,508
|
11,519
|
||||||||
Less
allowance for depreciation and amortization
|
3,296
|
2,996
|
|||||||
9,212
|
8,523
|
||||||||
Other
assets
|
1,171
|
442
|
|||||||
$
|
14,003
|
$
|
11,137
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
524
|
$
|
420
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
2,074
|
1,047
|
|||||||
Air
traffic liability
|
649
|
529
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
601
|
146
|
|||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
3,848
|
2,142
|
|||||||
Long-term
debt less current maturities
|
1,394
|
1,700
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,681
|
1,407
|
|||||||
Deferred
gains from sale and leaseback of aircraft
|
136
|
152
|
|||||||
Other
deferred liabilities
|
269
|
209
|
|||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||||
Common
stock, $1.00 par value: 2,000,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|||||||||
801,641,645
and 790,181,982 shares issued in 2005
|
|||||||||
and
2004, respectively
|
802
|
790
|
|||||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
963
|
777
|
|||||||
Retained
earnings
|
4,018
|
3,614
|
|||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
892
|
417
|
|||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost: 5,199,192 shares in 2004
|
-
|
(71
|
)
|
||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
6,675
|
5,527
|
|||||||
$
|
14,003
|
$
|
11,137
|
||||||
See
accompanying notes.
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
||||||||||
YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||||
(In
millions, except per share amounts)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||
Passenger
|
$
|
7,279
|
$
|
6,280
|
$
|
5,741
|
||||
Freight
|
133
|
117
|
94
|
|||||||
Other
|
172
|
133
|
102
|
|||||||
Total
operating revenues
|
7,584
|
6,530
|
5,937
|
|||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||
Salaries,
wages, and benefits
|
2,782
|
2,578
|
2,330
|
|||||||
Fuel
and oil
|
1,341
|
1,000
|
830
|
|||||||
Maintenance
materials and repairs
|
446
|
472
|
429
|
|||||||
Aircraft
rentals
|
163
|
179
|
183
|
|||||||
Landing
fees and other rentals
|
454
|
408
|
372
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
469
|
431
|
384
|
|||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
1,204
|
1,058
|
1,031
|
|||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
6,859
|
6,126
|
5,559
|
|||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
725
|
404
|
378
|
|||||||
OTHER
EXPENSES (INCOME):
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
122
|
88
|
91
|
|||||||
Capitalized
interest
|
(39
|
)
|
(39
|
)
|
(33
|
)
|
||||
Interest
income
|
(47
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
(24
|
)
|
||||
Other
(gains) losses, net
|
(90
|
)
|
37
|
(259
|
)
|
|||||
Total
other expenses (income)
|
(54
|
)
|
65
|
(225
|
)
|
|||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
779
|
339
|
603
|
|||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
295
|
124
|
231
|
|||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$
|
484
|
$
|
215
|
$
|
372
|
||||
NET
INCOME PER SHARE, BASIC
|
$
|
.61
|
$
|
.27
|
$
|
.48
|
||||
NET
INCOME PER SHARE, DILUTED
|
$
|
.60
|
$
|
.27
|
$
|
.46
|
||||
See
accompanying notes.
|
SOUTHWEST
AIRLINES CO.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2004, AND
2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Capital
in
|
other
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
excess
of
|
Retained
|
comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
millions, except per share amounts)
|
Stock
|
par
value
|
earnings
|
income
(loss)
|
stock
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2002
|
$
|
777
|
$
|
395
|
$
|
3,148
|
$
|
54
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
4,374
|
|||||||
Issuance
of common stock pursuant
|
|||||||||||||||||||
to
Employee stock plans
|
12
|
81
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
93
|
|||||||||||||
Tax
benefit of options exercised
|
-
|
29
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
29
|
|||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
-
|
107
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
107
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
dividends, $.018 per share
|
-
|
-
|
(14
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(14
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
372
|
-
|
-
|
372
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on derivative instruments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
66
|
-
|
66
|
|||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
|||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
440
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2003
|
$
|
789
|
$
|
612
|
$
|
3,506
|
$
|
122
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,029
|
|||||||
Purchase
of shares of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(246
|
)
|
(246
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Issuance
of common and treasury stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||
pursuant
to Employee stock plans
|
1
|
7
|
(93
|
)
|
-
|
175
|
90
|
||||||||||||
Tax
benefit of options exercised
|
-
|
23
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
23
|
|||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
-
|
135
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
135
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
dividends, $.018 per share
|
-
|
-
|
(14
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(14
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
215
|
-
|
-
|
215
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on derivative instruments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
293
|
-
|
293
|
|||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
|||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
510
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2004
|
$
|
790
|
$
|
777
|
$
|
3,614
|
$
|
417
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
$
|
5,527
|
||||||
Purchase
of shares of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(55
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Issuance
of common and treasury stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||
pursuant
to Employee stock plans
|
12
|
59
|
(66
|
)
|
-
|
126
|
131
|
||||||||||||
Tax
benefit of options exercised
|
-
|
47
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
47
|
|||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
-
|
80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
80
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
dividends, $.018 per share
|
-
|
-
|
(14
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(14
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
484
|
-
|
-
|
484
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on derivative
instruments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
474
|
-
|
474
|
|||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
959
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
$
|
802
|
$
|
963
|
$
|
4,018
|
$
|
892
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,675
|
|||||||
See
accompanying notes.
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||||
YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||||
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
484
|
$
|
215
|
$
|
372
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
||||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
469
|
431
|
384
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
291
|
166
|
190
|
|||||||
Amortization
of deferred gains on sale and
|
||||||||||
leaseback
of aircraft
|
(16
|
)
|
(16
|
)
|
(16
|
)
|
||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
80
|
135
|
107
|
|||||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation
expense
|
(47
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
(29
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in certain assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts
and other receivables
|
(9
|
)
|
(75
|
)
|
43
|
|||||
Other
current assets
|
(59
|
)
|
(44
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
855
|
231
|
129
|
|||||||
Air
traffic liability
|
120
|
68
|
50
|
|||||||
Other
|
(50
|
)
|
(22
|
)
|
50
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
2,118
|
1,066
|
1,261
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment, net
|
(1,146
|
)
|
(1,707
|
)
|
(1,192
|
)
|
||||
Change
in short-term investments, net
|
6
|
124
|
(381
|
)
|
||||||
Payment
for assets of ATA Airlines, Inc.
|
(6
|
)
|
(34
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Debtor
in possession loan to ATA Airlines, Inc.
|
-
|
(40
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Other
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,146
|
)
|
(1,658
|
)
|
(1,573
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Issuance
of long-term debt
|
300
|
520
|
-
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from Employee stock plans
|
132
|
88
|
93
|
|||||||
Payments
of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations
|
(149
|
)
|
(207
|
)
|
(130
|
)
|
||||
Payments
of cash dividends
|
(14
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
(55
|
)
|
(246
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation
arrangements
|
47
|
23
|
29
|
|||||||
Other,
net
|
(1
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
3
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
260
|
156
|
(19
|
)
|
||||||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
||||||||||
AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
1,232
|
(436
|
)
|
(331
|
)
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
|
||||||||||
BEGINNING
OF PERIOD
|
1,048
|
1,484
|
1,815
|
|||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF
PERIOD
|
$
|
2,280
|
$
|
1,048
|
$
|
1,484
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES
|
||||||||||
Cash
payments for:
|
||||||||||
Interest,
net of amount capitalized
|
$
|
71
|
$
|
38
|
$
|
62
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
51
|
||||
Noncash
rights to airport gates acquired through reduction
in
|
||||||||||
debtor
in possession loan to ATA Airlines, Inc.
|
$
|
20
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
See
accompanying notes.
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2005
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Changes
in Accounting
Effective
January 1, 2006, Southwest adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment" (SFAS
123R) using the modified retrospective transition method. SFAS 123R requires
that all stock-based compensation, including grants of employee stock options,
be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. Under the modified
retrospective method, prior years' results were retrospectively adjusted
to give
effect to the value of options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 1995.
Stock-based
compensation expense reported under SFAS 123R in the
accompanying financial statements does not exactly match the pro forma results
disclosed in the footnotes to previous years’ financial statements. We have
adjusted the amounts reported in prior period pro forma results primarily
to
exclude a previous assumption that if stock-based compensation expense were
recorded in the financial statements in prior periods, the Company’s
profitsharing contributions would be impacted by that expense. The amount
of
this adjustment related to 2005 was $12 million, the amount related to 2004
was
$20 million, and the amount related to 2003 was $16 million. On a per share
basis for 2005, the $12 million profitsharing amount resulted in a difference
of
$.02, both basic and diluted, compared to previously disclosed pro forma
amounts. On a per share basis for 2004, the $20 million profitsharing amount
resulted in a difference of $.03, basic and $.02, diluted, compared to
previously disclosed pro forma amounts. On a per share basis for 2003, the
$16
million profitsharing amount resulted in a difference of $.02, both basic
and
diluted, compared to previously disclosed pro forma amounts. These adjustments
had no impact on our balance sheets, statements of operations, cash flows,
or
stockholders’ equity as reported in prior periods.
In
addition, in first quarter 2006, the Company began
transitioning the maintenance program for performing planned airframe
maintenance on its fleet of 737-300 and 737-500 aircraft. Due to the change
in
the nature of the maintenance activities performed, the Company changed its
method of accounting for scheduled airframe and inspection repairs for 737-300
and 737-500 aircraft from the deferral method to the direct expense method,
effective January 1, 2006. Under the deferral method, scheduled airframe
and
inspection repairs were capitalized and amortized as a component of Maintenance,
materials and repairs expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income; under
the
direct expense method, scheduled airframe and inspection repairs are expensed
as
incurred. The Company recorded the change in accounting in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and
Error Corrections (SFAS 154), which was effective for calendar year
companies on January 1, 2006. SFAS 154 requires that all elective accounting
changes be made on a retrospective basis.
The
following table summarizes the impact of these accounting
changes on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the years ended December
31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:
Year
ended
|
Year
ended
|
Year
ended
|
||||||||
Dec
31
|
Dec
31
|
Dec
31
|
||||||||
(in
millions, except per share amounts)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
Net
income, as previously reported
|
$
|
548
|
$
|
313
|
$
|
442
|
||||
Less:
impact of SFAS 123R
|
||||||||||
(Salaries,
wages and benefits)
|
(80
|
)
|
(135
|
)
|
(107
|
)
|
||||
Less:
impact of change in maintenance accounting
|
||||||||||
(Maintenance
materials and repairs)
|
(15
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
3
|
|||||
Add:
Income tax benefit from accounting changes
|
31
|
52
|
34
|
|||||||
Net
income - As retrospectively
adjusted
|
$
|
484
|
$
|
215
|
$
|
372
|
||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding,
diluted,
|
||||||||||
as
previously reported
|
814
|
815
|
822
|
|||||||
Less:
impact of SFAS 123R
|
(8
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding, diluted
-
|
||||||||||
As
retrospectively adjusted
|
806
|
804
|
810
|
|||||||
Net
income per share, basic, as previously
reported
|
$
|
.70
|
$
|
.40
|
$
|
.56
|
||||
Less:
impact of SFAS 123R, net of tax
|
(.08
|
)
|
(.12
|
)
|
(.09
|
)
|
||||
Less:
impact of maintenance accounting
|
||||||||||
change,
net of tax
|
(.01
|
)
|
(.01
|
)
|
.01
|
|||||
Net
income per share, basic -
|
||||||||||
As
retrospectively adjusted
|
$
|
.61
|
$
|
.27
|
$
|
.48
|
||||
Net
income per share, diluted, as previously
reported
|
$
|
.67
|
$
|
.38
|
$
|
.54
|
||||
Less:
impact of SFAS 123R, net of tax
|
(.06
|
)
|
(.10
|
)
|
(.08
|
)
|
||||
Less:
impact of maintenance accounting
|
||||||||||
change,
net of tax
|
(.01
|
)
|
(.01
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Net
income per share, diluted -
|
||||||||||
As
retrospectively adjusted
|
$
|
.60
|
$
|
.27
|
$
|
.46
|
The
Statement of Cash Flows has been retrospectively revised to
reclassify the cash inflows related to excess tax benefits for employee exercise
of options from operating activities to financing activities.
As
a result of these accounting changes, we revised the following
notes (numbering is as filed in the Company’s original filing of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K):
-
Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - The pro
forma disclosure of stock-based compensation expense has been eliminated
and the
discussion of Aircraft and engine maintenance has been updated based on the
change in accounting for airframes.
-
Note 2, Accounting changes - The discussion of the planned 2006
accounting changes has been eliminated.
-
Note 10, Derivative and financial instruments - Disclosures have
been revised to reflect the accounting changes. Derivative and financial
instruments is now Note 9.
-
Note 11, Comprehensive income - Disclosures have been revised to
reflect the accounting changes. Comprehensive income is now Note 10.
-
Note 13, Stock Plans - Disclosures have been revised to reflect
the adoption of SFAS 123R. Stock plans is now Note 12.
-
Note 15, Income Taxes - Income tax disclosures have been revised
to reflect the accounting changes and the related income tax effects. Income
taxes is now Note 14.
-
Note 16, Net income per share - Disclosures have been revised to
reflect the accounting changes. Net income per share is now Note 15.
Other
than the revised numbering compared to the Company’s
original filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, the notes have not been
updated for any other subsequent developments. See our quarterly report on
Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, for the most current information.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) is a
major domestic airline that provides point-to-point, low-fare service. The
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Southwest and its
wholly owned subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States
(GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current presentation. In the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December
31,
2004, the Company has reclassified certain amounts as “Short-term investments”,
that were previously classified as “Cash and cash equivalents.” In the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2004 and 2003, changes in the amounts
of “Short-term investments” are classified as cash flows from investing
activities. In the Consolidated Statement of Income for 2004 and 2003, amounts
previously classified as “Agency commissions” are now classified in “Other
operating expenses.”
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash in excess of that necessary for
operating requirements is invested in short-term, highly liquid,
income-producing investments. Investments with maturities of three months
or
less are classified as cash and cash equivalents, which primarily consist
of
certificates of deposit, money market funds, and investment grade commercial
paper issued by major corporations and financial institutions. Cash and cash
equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value.
SHORT-TERM
INVESTMENTS Short-term investments consist of auction
rate securities with auction reset periods of less than 12 months. These
investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are stated
at
fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are recognized in
“Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet. Realized gains and losses are reflected in “Interest income” in
the accompanying Consolidated Income Statement.
INVENTORIES
Inventories of flight equipment expendable parts,
materials, and supplies are carried at average cost. These items are generally
charged to expense when issued for use.
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT Depreciation is provided by the
straight-line method to estimated residual values over periods generally
ranging
from 23 to 25 years for flight equipment and 5 to 30 years for ground property
and equipment once the asset is placed in service. Residual values estimated
for
aircraft are 15 percent and for ground property and equipment range from
zero to
10 percent. Property under capital leases and related obligations are recorded
at an amount equal to the present value of future minimum lease payments
computed on the basis of the Company’s incremental borrowing rate or, when
known, the interest rate implicit in the lease. Amortization of property
under
capital leases is on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included
in depreciation expense.
In
estimating the lives and expected residual values of its
aircraft, the Company primarily has relied upon actual experience with the
same
or similar aircraft types and recommendations from Boeing, the manufacturer
of
the Company’s aircraft. Subsequent revisions to these estimates, which can be
significant, could be caused by changes to the Company’s maintenance program,
modifications or improvements to the aircraft, changes in utilization of
the
aircraft (actual flight hours or cycles during a given period of time),
governmental regulations on aging aircraft, changing market prices of new
and
used aircraft of the same or similar types, etc. The Company evaluates its
estimates and assumptions each reporting period and, when warranted, adjusts
these estimates and assumptions. Generally, these adjustments are accounted
for
on a prospective basis through depreciation and amortization expense, as
required by GAAP.
When
appropriate, the Company evaluates its long-lived assets used
in operations for impairment. Impairment losses would be recorded when events
and circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired and the undiscounted
cash flows to be generated by that asset are less than the carrying amounts
of
the asset. Factors that would indicate potential impairment include, but
are not
limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived
asset(s), a significant change in the long-lived asset’s physical condition,
operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the long-lived asset,
etc. While the airline industry as a whole has experienced many of these
indicators, Southwest has continued to operate all of its aircraft and continues
to experience positive cash flow.
AIRCRAFT
AND ENGINE MAINTENANCE The cost of scheduled inspections
and repairs and routine maintenance costs for all aircraft and engines are
charged to maintenance expense as incurred. Modifications that significantly
enhance the operating performance or extend the useful lives of aircraft
or
engines are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the asset.
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS Intangible assets primarily consist of leasehold
rights to airport owned gates acquired by the Company during 2004 and 2005.
These assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful
life of the lease, approximately 20 years. The accumulated amortization related
to the Company’s intangible assets at December 31, 2004, and 2005, was not
material. The Company periodically assesses its intangible assets for impairment
in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets;
however, no impairments have been noted.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION Tickets sold are initially deferred as
“Air traffic liability”. Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is
provided. “Air traffic liability” primarily represents tickets sold for future
travel dates and estimated refunds and exchanges of tickets sold for past
travel
dates. The majority of the Company’s tickets sold are nonrefundable. Tickets
that are sold but not flown on the travel date can be reused for another
flight,
up to a year from the date of sale, or refunded (if the ticket is refundable).
A
small percentage of tickets (or partial tickets) expire unused. The Company
estimates the amount of future refunds and exchanges, net of forfeitures,
for
all unused tickets once the flight date has passed. These estimates are based
on
historical experience over many years. The Company and members of the airline
industry have consistently applied this accounting method to estimate revenue
from forfeited tickets at the date travel is provided. Estimated future refunds
and exchanges included in the air traffic liability account are constantly
evaluated based on subsequent refund and exchange activity to validate the
accuracy of the Company’s revenue recognition method with respect to forfeited
tickets.
Events
and circumstances outside of historical fare sale activity
or historical Customer travel patterns can result in actual refunds, exchanges
or forfeited tickets differing significantly from estimates; however, these
differences have historically not been material. Additional factors that
may
affect estimated refunds, exchanges, and forfeitures include, but may not
be
limited to, the Company’s refund and exchange policy, the mix of refundable and
nonrefundable fares, and fare sale activity. The Company’s estimation techniques
have been consistently applied from year to year; however, as with any
estimates, actual refund and exchange activity may vary from estimated amounts.
FREQUENT
FLYER PROGRAM The Company accrues the estimated
incremental cost of providing free travel for awards earned under its Rapid
Rewards frequent flyer program. The Company also sells frequent flyer credits
and related services to companies participating in its Rapid Rewards frequent
flyer program. Funds received from the sale of flight segment credits are
accounted for under the residual value method. The portion of those funds
associated with future travel are deferred and recognized as “Passenger revenue”
when the ultimate free travel awards are flown or the credits expire unused.
The
portion of the funds not associated with future travel are recognized in
“Other
revenue” in the period earned.
ADVERTISING
The Company expenses the costs of advertising as
incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004,
and
2003 was $173 million, $158 million, and $155 million, respectively.
STOCK-BASED
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION The Company has stock-based
compensation plans covering the majority of its Employee groups, including
a
plan covering the Company's Board of Directors and plans related to employment
contracts with certain Executive Officers of the Company. The Company accounts
for stock-based compensation utilizing the fair value recognition provisions
of
SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”.
See
Note 12 for further discussion of the Company’s stock-based
Employee compensation.
FINANCIAL
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS The Company accounts for
financial derivative instruments utilizing Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133 (SFAS 133), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging
Activities", as amended. The Company utilizes various derivative instruments,
including crude oil, unleaded gasoline, and heating oil-based derivatives,
to
hedge a portion of its exposure to jet fuel price increases. These instruments
primarily consist of purchased call options, collar structures, and fixed-price
swap agreements, and are accounted for as cash-flow hedges, as defined by
SFAS
133. The Company has also entered into interest rate swap agreements to convert
a portion of its fixed-rate debt to floating rates. These interest rate hedges
are accounted for as fair value hedges, as defined by SFAS 133.
Since
the majority of the Company’s financial derivative
instruments are not traded on a market exchange, the Company estimates their
fair values. Depending on the type of instrument, the values are determined
by
the use of present value methods or standard option value models with
assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying
markets. Also, since there is not a reliable forward market for jet fuel,
the
Company must estimate the future prices of jet fuel in order to measure the
effectiveness of the hedging instruments in offsetting changes to those prices,
as required by SFAS 133. Forward jet fuel prices are estimated through the
observation of similar commodity futures prices (such as crude oil, heating
oil,
and unleaded gasoline) and adjusted based on historical variations to those
like
commodities. See Note 9 for further information on SFAS 133 and financial
derivative instruments.
INCOME
TAXES The Company accounts for deferred income taxes
utilizing Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109),
"Accounting for Income Taxes", as amended. SFAS 109 requires an asset and
liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
based on the tax effects of temporary differences between the financial
statements and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, as measured by current
enacted tax rates. When appropriate, in accordance with SFAS 109, the Company
evaluates the need for a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets.
2.
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN ASSETS
In
fourth quarter 2004, Southwest was selected as the winning
bidder at a bankruptcy-court approved auction for certain ATA Airlines, Inc.
(ATA) assets. As part of the transaction, which was approved in December
2004,
Southwest agreed to pay $40 million for certain ATA assets, consisting of
the
leasehold rights to six of ATA’s leased Chicago Midway Airport gates and the
rights to a leased aircraft maintenance hangar at Chicago Midway Airport.
In
addition, Southwest provided ATA with $40 million in debtor-in-possession
financing while ATA remains in bankruptcy, and also guaranteed the repayment
of
an ATA construction loan to the City of Chicago for $7 million. As part of
this
original transaction, Southwest also committed, upon ATA’s emergence from
bankruptcy, to convert the debtor-in-possession financing to a term loan,
payable over five years, and to invest $30 million in cash into ATA convertible
preferred stock.
During
fourth quarter 2005, ATA, although still in bankruptcy,
entered into an agreement in which an investor, MatlinPatterson Global
Opportunities Partners II (“MatlinPatterson”) would provide financing to enable
ATA to emerge from bankruptcy in early 2006. As part of this transaction,
Southwest entered into an agreement with ATA to acquire the leasehold rights
to
four additional leased gates at Chicago Midway Airport in exchange for a
$20
million reduction in the Company’s debtor-in-possession loan. This resulted in a
$20 million increase to intangible assets, classified in Other assets, and
a
corresponding $20 million decrease in Accounts and other receivables on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Since this transaction was non-cash, it is not
reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Upon ATA’s emergence from
bankruptcy, it will repay the remaining $20 million balance of the
debtor-in-possession financing, and will provide a letter of credit to support
Southwest’s obligation under the construction loan to the City of Chicago. In
addition, as part of the 2005 agreement, Southwest has also been relieved
of its
commitment to purchase ATA convertible preferred stock. The 2005 agreement
is
subject to certain conditions including ATA’s successful emergence from
bankruptcy on or before February 28, 2006.
Southwest
and ATA agreed on a code share arrangement, which was
approved by the Department of Transportation in January 2005. Under the
agreement, which has since been expanded, each carrier can exchange passengers
on certain designated flights. Sales of the code share flights began January
16,
2005, with travel dates beginning February 4, 2005. As part of the December
2005
agreement with ATA, Southwest has enhanced its codeshare arrangement with
ATA,
subject to certain conditions, including ATA’s confirmation of a Plan of
Reorganization, which must be fulfilled by February 28, 2006.
3.
COMMITMENTS
The
Company's contractual purchase commitments primarily consist
of scheduled aircraft acquisitions from Boeing. As of December 31, 2005,
the
Company had contractual purchase commitments with Boeing for 33 737-700 aircraft
deliveries in 2006, 28 scheduled for delivery in 2007, and six in 2008. During
January 2006, the Company exercised an additional option for 2007 to bring
our
commitment to 29 aircraft for that year. In addition, the Company has options
and purchase rights for an additional 249 737-700s that it may acquire during
2007-2012, following the January 2006 option exercise. The Company has the
option, which must be exercised two years prior to the contractual delivery
date, to substitute 737-600s or 737-800s for the 737-700s. As of December
31,
2005, aggregate funding needed for firm commitments is approximately $1.3
billion, subject to adjustments for inflation, due as follows: $740 million
in
2006, $458 million in 2007, and $80 million in 2008.
4.
ACCRUED LIABILITIES
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Retirement
plans (Note 14)
|
$
|
142
|
$
|
89
|
|||
Aircraft
rentals
|
116
|
127
|
|||||
Vacation
pay
|
135
|
120
|
|||||
Advances
and deposits
|
955
|
334
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
489
|
218
|
|||||
Other
|
237
|
159
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
$
|
2,074
|
$
|
1,047
|
5.
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY
The
Company has a revolving credit facility under which it can
borrow up to $600 million from a group of banks. The facility expires in
August
2010 and is unsecured. At the Company’s option, interest on the facility can be
calculated on one of several different bases. For most borrowings, Southwest
would anticipate choosing a floating rate based upon LIBOR. If fully drawn,
the
spread over LIBOR would be 62.5 basis points given Southwest’s credit rating at
December 31, 2005. The facility also contains a financial covenant requiring
a
minimum coverage ratio of adjusted pretax income to fixed obligations, as
defined. As of December 31, 2005, the Company is in compliance with this
covenant, and there are no outstanding amounts borrowed under this
facility.
6.
LONG-TERM DEBT
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
8%
Notes due 2005
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
100
|
|||
Zero
coupon Notes due 2006
|
58
|
58
|
|||||
Pass
Through Certificates
|
523
|
544
|
|||||
7
7/8% Notes due 2007
|
100
|
100
|
|||||
French
Credit Agreements due 2012
|
41
|
44
|
|||||
6
1/2% Notes due 2012
|
370
|
377
|
|||||
5
1/4% Notes due 2014
|
340
|
348
|
|||||
5
1/8% Notes due 2017
|
300
|
-
|
|||||
French
Credit Agreements due 2017
|
106
|
111
|
|||||
7
3/8% Debentures due 2027
|
100
|
100
|
|||||
Capital
leases (Note 8)
|
74
|
80
|
|||||
2,012
|
1,862
|
||||||
Less
current maturities
|
601
|
146
|
|||||
Less
debt discount and issue costs
|
17
|
16
|
|||||
$
|
1,394
|
$
|
1,700
|
In
first quarter 2005, the Company redeemed its $100 million
senior unsecured 8% Notes on their maturity date of March 1, 2005.
During
February 2005, the Company issued $300 million senior
unsecured Notes due 2017. The notes bear interest at 5.125 percent, payable
semi-annually in arrears, with the first payment made on September 1, 2005.
Southwest used the net proceeds from the issuance of the notes, approximately
$296 million, for general corporate purposes.
In
fourth quarter 2004, the Company entered into four identical
13-year floating-rate financing arrangements, whereby it borrowed a total
of
$112 million from French banking partnerships. Although the interest on the
borrowings are at floating rates, the Company estimates that, considering
the
full effect of the “net present value benefits” included in the transactions,
the effective economic yield over the 13-year term of the loans will be
approximately LIBOR minus 45 basis points. Principal and interest are payable
semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 for each of the loans, and the Company
may terminate the arrangements in any year on either of those dates, with
certain conditions. The Company pledged four aircraft as collateral for the
transactions.
In
September 2004, the Company issued $350 million senior
unsecured Notes due 2014. The notes bear interest at 5.25 percent, payable
semi-annually in arrears, on April 1 and October 1. Concurrently, the Company
entered into an interest-rate swap agreement to convert this fixed-rate debt
to
a floating rate. See Note 9 for more information on the interest-rate swap
agreement. Southwest used the net proceeds from the issuance of the notes,
approximately $346 million, for general corporate purposes.
In
February 2004 and April 2004, the Company issued two separate
$29 million two-year notes, each secured by one new 737-700 aircraft. Both
of
the notes are non-interest bearing and accrete to face value at maturity
at
annual rates of 2.9 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively. The proceeds of
these
borrowings were used to fund the individual aircraft purchases.
On
March 1, 2002, the Company issued $385 million senior unsecured
Notes due March 1, 2012. The notes bear interest at 6.5 percent, payable
semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Southwest used the net proceeds
from
the issuance of the notes, approximately $380 million, for general corporate
purposes. During 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement
relating to these notes. See Note 9 for further information.
On
October 30, 2001, the Company issued $614 million Pass Through
Certificates consisting of $150 million 5.1% Class A-1 certificates, $375
million 5.5% Class A-2 certificates, and $89 million 6.1% Class B certificates.
A separate trust was established for each class of certificates. The trusts
used
the proceeds from the sale of certificates to acquire equipment notes, which
were issued by Southwest on a full recourse basis. Payments on the equipment
notes held in each trust will be passed through to the holders of certificates
of such trust. The equipment notes were issued for each of 29 Boeing 737-700
aircraft owned by Southwest and are secured by a mortgage on such aircraft.
Interest on the equipment notes held for the certificates is payable
semiannually, on May 1 and November 1. Beginning May 1, 2002, principal payments
on the equipment notes held for the Class A-1 certificates are due semiannually
until the balance of the certificates mature on May 1, 2006. The entire
principal of the equipment notes for the Class A-2 and Class B certificates
are
scheduled for payment on November 1, 2006. During 2003, the Company entered
into
an interest rate swap agreement relating to the $375 million 5.5% Class A-2
certificates. See Note 9 for further information.
In
fourth quarter 1999, the Company entered into two identical
13-year floating rate financing arrangements, whereby it borrowed a total
of $56
million from French banking partnerships. Although the interest on the
borrowings are at floating rates, the Company estimates that, considering
the
full effect of the “net present value benefits” included in the transactions,
the effective economic yield over the 13-year term of the loans will be
approximately LIBOR minus 67 basis points. Principal and interest are payable
semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 for each of the loans and the Company
may terminate the arrangements in any year on either of those dates, with
certain conditions. The Company pledged two aircraft as collateral for the
transactions.
On
February 28, 1997, the Company issued $100 million of senior
unsecured 7 3/8% Debentures due March 1, 2027. Interest is payable semi-annually
on March 1 and September 1. The debentures may be redeemed, at the option
of the
Company, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption
price equal to the greater of the principal amount of the debentures plus
accrued interest at the date of redemption or the sum of the present values
of
the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon, discounted
to the date of redemption at the comparable treasury rate plus 20 basis points,
plus accrued interest at the date of redemption.
During
1992, the Company issued $100 million of senior unsecured 7
7/8% Notes due September 1, 2007. Interest is payable semi-annually on March
1
and September 1. The notes are not redeemable prior to maturity.
The
net book value of the assets pledged as collateral for the
Company's secured borrowings, primarily aircraft and engines, was
$856 million at December 31, 2005.
As
of December 31, 2005, aggregate annual principal maturities
(not including amounts associated with interest rate swap agreements, and
interest on capital leases) for the five-year period ending December 31,
2010,
were $612 million in 2006, $127 million in 2007, $28 million in 2008, $29
million in 2009, $30 million in 2010, and $1.2 billion thereafter.
7.
LEASES
The
Company had nine aircraft classified as capital leases at
December 31, 2005. The amounts applicable to these aircraft included in property
and equipment were:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Flight
equipment
|
$
|
164
|
$
|
173
|
|||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
113
|
126
|
|||||
$
|
51
|
$
|
47
|
Total
rental expense for operating leases, both aircraft and
other, charged to operations in 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $409 million, $403
million, and $386 million, respectively. The majority of the Company's terminal
operations space, as well as 84 aircraft, were under operating leases at
December 31, 2005. Future minimum lease payments under capital leases and
noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess
of one
year at December 31, 2005, were:
(In
millions)
|
Capital
leases
|
Operating
leases
|
|||||
2006
|
$
|
16
|
$
|
332
|
|||
2007
|
16
|
309
|
|||||
2008
|
16
|
274
|
|||||
2009
|
16
|
235
|
|||||
2010
|
15
|
219
|
|||||
After
2010
|
12
|
1,164
|
|||||
Total
minimum lease payments
|
91
|
$
|
2,533
|
||||
Less
amount representing interest
|
17
|
||||||
Present
value of minimum
|
|||||||
lease
payments
|
74
|
||||||
Less
current portion
|
11
|
||||||
Long-term
portion
|
$
|
63
|
The
aircraft leases generally can be renewed at rates based on
fair market value at the end of the lease term for one to five years. Most
aircraft leases have purchase options at or near the end of the lease term
at
fair market value, generally limited to a stated percentage of the lessor's
defined cost of the aircraft.
8.
CONSOLIDATION OF RESERVATIONS CENTERS
In
November 2003, the Company announced the consolidation of its
nine Reservations Centers into six, effective February 28, 2004. This decision
was made in response to the established shift by Customers to the internet
as a
preferred way of booking travel. The Company’s website,
www.southwest.com, now accounts for almost 70 percent of ticket
bookings and, as a consequence, demand for phone contact has dramatically
decreased. During first quarter 2004, the Company closed its Reservations
Centers located in Dallas, Texas, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Little Rock,
Arkansas. The Company provided the 1,900 affected Employees at these locations
the opportunity to relocate to another of the Company’s remaining six centers.
Those Employees choosing not to relocate, approximately 55% of the total
affected, were offered support packages, which included severance pay, flight
benefits, medical coverage, and job-search assistance, depending on length
of
service with the Company. The total cost associated with the Reservations
Center
consolidation, recognized in first quarter 2004, was approximately $18 million.
Employee severance and benefit costs were reflected in “Salaries, wages, and
benefits,” and the majority of other costs in “Other operating expenses” in the
Consolidated Statement of Income. The total remaining amount accrued (not
yet
paid) was immaterial at December 31, 2005.
9.
DERIVATIVE AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fuel
contracts
Airline
operators are inherently dependent upon energy to operate
and, therefore, are impacted by changes in jet fuel prices. Jet fuel and
oil
consumed in 2005, 2004, and 2003 represented approximately 19.6 percent,
16.3
percent, and 14.9 percent of Southwest’s operating expenses, respectively. The
Company endeavors to acquire jet fuel at the lowest possible cost. Because
jet
fuel is not traded on an organized futures exchange, liquidity for hedging
is
limited. However, the Company has found commodities for effective hedging
of jet
fuel costs, primarily crude oil, and refined products such as heating oil
and
unleaded gasoline. The Company utilizes financial derivative instruments
as
hedges to decrease its exposure to jet fuel price increases. The Company
does
not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes.
The
Company has utilized financial derivative instruments for both
short-term and long-term time frames. In addition to the significant hedging
positions the Company had in place during 2005, the Company also has significant
future hedging positions. At December 31, 2005, the Company had a mixture
of
purchased call options, collar structures, and fixed price swap agreements
in
place to hedge over 70 percent of its 2006 total anticipated jet fuel
requirements at average crude oil equivalent prices of approximately $36
per
barrel, and had also hedged the refinery margins on most of those positions.
The
Company accounts for its fuel hedge derivative instruments as
cash flow hedges, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended (SFAS 133). Under SFAS 133, all derivatives designated as hedges
that
meet certain requirements are granted special hedge accounting treatment.
Generally, utilizing the special hedge accounting, all periodic changes in
fair
value of the derivatives designated as hedges that are considered to be
effective, as defined, are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive income"
until the underlying jet fuel is consumed. See Note 10 for further information
on Accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company is exposed to the
risk
that periodic changes will not be effective, as defined, or that the derivatives
will no longer qualify for special hedge accounting. Ineffectiveness, as
defined, results when the change in the total fair value of the derivative
instrument does not exactly equal the change in the value of the Company’s
expected future cash outlay to purchase jet fuel. To the extent that the
periodic changes in the fair value of the derivatives are not effective,
that
ineffectiveness is recorded to “Other gains and losses” in the income statement.
Likewise, if a hedge ceases to qualify for hedge accounting, those periodic
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded to “Other gains
and losses” in the income statement in the period of the change.
Ineffectiveness
is inherent in hedging jet fuel with derivative
positions based in other crude oil related commodities, especially given
the
magnitude of the current fair market value of the Company’s fuel hedge
derivatives and the recent volatility in the prices of refined products.
Due to
the volatility in markets for crude oil and related products, the Company
is
unable to predict the amount of ineffectiveness each period, including the
loss
of hedge accounting, which could be determined on a derivative by derivative
basis or in the aggregate. This may result in increased volatility in the
Company’s results. The significant increase in the amount of hedge
ineffectiveness and unrealized gains on derivative contracts settling in
future
periods recorded during the Company’s most recent five fiscal quarters was due
to a number of factors. These factors included: the recent significant
fluctuation in energy prices, the number of derivative positions the Company
holds, significant weather events that have affected refinery capacity and
the
production of refined products, and the volatility of the different types
of
products the Company uses in hedging. The number of instances in which the
Company has discontinued hedge accounting for specific hedges has increased
recently, primarily due to these reasons. In these cases, the Company has
determined that the hedges will not regain effectiveness in the time period
remaining until settlement and therefore must discontinue special hedge
accounting, as defined by SFAS 133. When this happens, any changes in fair
value
of the derivative instruments are marked to market through earnings in the
period of change. As the fair value of the Company’s hedge positions increases
in amount, there is a higher degree of probability that there will be continued
variability recorded in the income statement and that the amount of hedge
ineffectiveness and unrealized gains or losses recorded in future periods
will
be material. This is primarily due to the fact that small differences in
the
correlation of crude oil related products are leveraged over large dollar
volumes.
During
2005, the Company recognized approximately $110 million of
additional income in "Other (gains) losses, net," related to the ineffectiveness
of its hedges and the loss of hedge accounting for certain hedges. Of this
amount, approximately $77 million of the additional income was unrealized,
mark-to-market changes in the fair value of derivatives due to the
discontinuation of hedge accounting for certain contracts that will settle
in
future periods, approximately $9 million was ineffectiveness associated with
hedges designated for future periods, and $24 million was ineffectiveness
and
mark-to-market gains related to hedges that settled during 2005. During 2004,
the Company recognized approximately $13 million of additional expense in
"Other
(gains) losses, net," related to the ineffectiveness of its hedges. During
2003,
the Company recognized approximately $16 million of additional income in
"Other
(gains) losses, net," related to the ineffectiveness of its hedges. During
2005,
2004, and 2003, the Company recognized approximately $35 million, $24 million,
and $29 million of net expense, respectively, related to amounts excluded
from
the Company's measurements of hedge effectiveness, in "Other (gains) losses,
net".
During
2005, 2004, and 2003, the Company recognized gains in "Fuel
and oil" expense of $892 million, $455 million, and $171 million, respectively,
from hedging activities. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, approximately $83
million and $51 million, respectively, due from third parties from expired
derivative contracts, is included in "Accounts and other receivables" in
the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Company's
financial derivative instruments at December 31, 2005, was a net asset of
approximately $1.7 billion. The current portion of these financial derivative
instruments, $640 million, is classified as "Fuel hedge contracts" and the
long-term portion, $1.1 billion, is classified as "Other assets" in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the derivative instruments,
depending on the type of instrument, was determined by the use of present
value
methods or standard option value models with assumptions about commodity
prices
based on those observed in underlying markets.
As
of December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $892
million in unrealized gains, net of tax, in "Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)" related to fuel hedges. Included in this total are approximately
$327 million in net unrealized gains that are expected to be realized in
earnings during 2006.
Interest
Rate Swaps
During
2003, the Company entered into interest rate swap
agreements relating to its $385 million 6.5% senior unsecured notes due 2012
and
$375 million 5.496% Class A-2 pass-through certificates due 2006. The floating
rate paid under each agreement is set in arrears. Under the first agreement,
the
Company pays the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin every
six
months and receives 6.5% every six months on a notional amount of $385 million
until 2012. The average floating rate paid under this agreement during 2005
is
estimated to be 6.46 percent based on actual and forward rates at December
31,
2005. Under the second agreement, the Company pays LIBOR plus a margin every
six
months and receives 5.496% every six months on a notional amount of $375
million
until 2006. Based on actual and forward rates at December 31, 2005, the average
floating rate paid under this agreement during 2005 is estimated to be 6.73
percent.
During
2004, the Company entered into an interest rate swap
agreement relating to its $350 million 5.25% senior unsecured notes due 2014.
Under this agreement, the Company pays LIBOR plus a margin every six months
and
receives 5.25% every six months on a notional amount of $350 million until
2014.
The floating rate is set in advance. The average floating rate paid under
this
agreement during 2005 was 3.82 percent.
The
primary objective for the Company’s use of interest rate
hedges is to reduce the volatility of net interest income by better matching
the
repricing of its assets and liabilities. Concurrently, the Company's interest
rate hedges are also intended to take advantage of market conditions in which
short-term rates are significantly lower than the fixed longer term rates
on the
Company's long-term debt. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements qualify as
fair value hedges, as defined by SFAS 133. The fair value of the interest
rate
swap agreements, which are adjusted regularly, are recorded in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet, as necessary, with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying
value of the long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swap
agreements, excluding accrued interest, at December 31, 2005, was a liability
of
approximately $31 million. The long-term portion of this amount is recorded
in
“Other deferred liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the current
portion is reflected in “Accrued liabilities.” In accordance with fair value
hedging, the offsetting entry is an adjustment to decrease the carrying value
of
long-term debt. See Note 6.
Outstanding
financial derivative instruments expose the Company to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the
agreements. However, the Company does not expect any of the counterparties
to
fail to meet their obligations. The credit exposure related to these financial
instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts with a positive
fair
value at the reporting date. To manage credit risk, the Company selects and
periodically reviews counterparties based on credit ratings, limits its exposure
to a single counterparty, and monitors the market position of the program
and
its relative market position with each counterparty. At December 31, 2005,
the
Company had agreements with seven counterparties containing early termination
rights and/or bilateral collateral provisions whereby security is required
if
market risk exposure exceeds a specified threshold amount or credit ratings
fall
below certain levels. At December 31, 2005, the Company held $950 million
in
fuel hedge related cash collateral deposits under these bilateral collateral
provisions. These collateral deposits serve to decrease, but not totally
eliminate, the credit risk associated with the Company’s hedging program. The
cash deposits, which can have a significant impact on the Company’s cash balance
and cash flows as of and for a particular operating period, are included
in
“Accrued liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are included as
“Operating cash flows” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
The
carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s
long-term debt and fuel contracts at December 31, 2005 were as follows:
(In
millions)
|
Carrying
value
|
Estimated
fair value
|
|||||
Zero
coupon Notes due 2006
|
$
|
58
|
$
|
58
|
|||
Pass
Through Certificates
|
523
|
525
|
|||||
7
7/8% Notes due 2007
|
100
|
104
|
|||||
French
Credit Agreements due 2012
|
41
|
41
|
|||||
6
1/2% Notes due 2012
|
370
|
392
|
|||||
5
1/4% Notes due 2014
|
340
|
332
|
|||||
5
1/8% Notes due 2017
|
300
|
282
|
|||||
French
Credit Agreements due 2017
|
106
|
106
|
|||||
7
3/8% Debentures due 2027
|
100
|
111
|
|||||
Fuel
contracts
|
1,678
|
1,678
|
The
estimated fair values of the Company’s publicly held long-term
debt were based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of all other
financial instruments approximate their fair value.
10.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive
income includes changes in the fair value of certain
financial derivative instruments, which qualify for hedge accounting, and
unrealized gains and losses on certain investments. Comprehensive income
totaled
$959 million, $510 million, and $440 million for 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively. The differences between “Net income” and “Comprehensive income”
for these years are as follows:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
484
|
$
|
215
|
$
|
372
|
||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on derivative
|
||||||||||
instruments,
net of deferred taxes of
|
||||||||||
$300,
$185 and $43
|
474
|
293
|
66
|
|||||||
Other,
net of deferred taxes of $0,
|
||||||||||
$1
and $1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||
Total
other comprehensive income
|
475
|
295
|
68
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
959
|
$
|
510
|
$
|
440
|
A
rollforward of the amounts included in "Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)", net of taxes for 2005, 2004, and 2003, is shown
below:
|
Fuel
|
|
Accumulated
other
|
|||||||
hedge
|
comprehensive
|
|||||||||
(In
millions)
|
derivatives
|
Other
|
income
(loss)
|
|||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2003
|
$
|
123
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
122
|
|||
2004
changes in fair value
|
558
|
2
|
560
|
|||||||
Reclassification
to earnings
|
(265
|
)
|
-
|
(265
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at December 31, 2004
|
416
|
1
|
417
|
|||||||
2005
changes in fair value
|
999
|
1
|
1,000
|
|||||||
Reclassification
to earnings
|
(525
|
)
|
-
|
(525
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
$
|
890
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
892
|
11.
COMMON STOCK
The
Company has one class of common stock. Holders of shares of
common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the
Board
of Directors and are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted
to
a vote of the shareholders. At December 31, 2005, the Company had 236 million
shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to Employee stock benefit
plans (of which 36 million shares have not been granted.)
In
January 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to $300 million of the Company’s common stock, utilizing
proceeds from the exercise of Employee stock options. Repurchases were made
in
accordance with applicable securities laws in the open market or in private
transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions. During first
quarter 2005, the Company completed this program. In total, the Company
repurchased approximately 20.9 million of its common shares during the course
of
the program.
In
January 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to $300 million of the Company’s common stock. Repurchases will
be made in accordance with applicable securities laws in the open market
or in
private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions.
12.
STOCK PLANS
The
Company has stock plans covering Employees subject to
collective bargaining agreements (collective bargaining plans) and stock
plans
covering Employees not subject to collective bargaining agreements (other
Employee plans). None of the collective bargaining plans were required to
be
approved by shareholders. Options granted to Employees under collective
bargaining plans are non-qualified, granted at or above the fair market value
of
the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and generally have terms
ranging from six to twelve years. Neither Executive Officers nor members
of the
Company’s Board of Directors are eligible to participate in any of these
collective bargaining plans. Options granted to Employees through other Employee
plans are both qualified as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and non-qualified stock options, granted at the fair market
value
of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and have ten-year terms. All
of the options included under the heading of “Other Employee Plans” have been
approved by shareholders, except the plan covering non-management, non-contract
Employees, which had options outstanding to purchase 6.3 million shares of
the
Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2005. Although the Company does not
have a formal policy per se, upon option exercise, the Company will typically
issue Treasury stock, to the extent such shares are available.
Vesting
terms for the collective bargaining plans differ based on
the grant made, and have ranged in length from immediate vesting to vesting
periods in accordance with the period covered by the respective collective
bargaining agreement. For “Other Employee Plans”, options vest and become fully
exercisable over three, five, or ten years of continued employment, depending
upon the grant type. For grants in any of the Company’s plans that are subject
to graded vesting over a service period, we recognize expense on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. None of the
Company’s grants include performance-based or market-based vesting conditions,
as defined.
The
Consolidated Statement of Income for 2005, 2004, and 2003
reflects share-based compensation cost of $80 million, $135 million, and
$107
million, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized from share-based
compensation arrangements for 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $25 million, $46 million,
and $36 million, respectively. For 2005, 2004, and 2003, the Company’s net
earnings were reduced by $55 million, $89 million, and $71 million,
respectively, compared to the previous accounting method under APB 25. For
2005,
2004, and 2003, net income per share, basic was reduced by $.08, $.12, and
$.09,
respectively, compared to the previous accounting under APB 25. For 2005,
2004,
and 2003, net income per share, diluted was reduced by $.06, $.10, and $.08,
respectively, compared to the previous accounting under APB 25.
Prior
to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company was required to
record benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized
compensation cost as an operating cash flow. However, SFAS 123R requires
that
such benefits be recorded as a financing cash inflow and corresponding operating
cash outflow. In the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for
2005,
2004, and 2003, the respective $47 million, $23 million, and $29 million
tax
benefits classified as a financing cash flows (and corresponding operating
cash
outflows) were classified as an operating cash inflows prior to the adoption
of
SFAS 123R.
The
fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following
weighted-average assumptions were used for grants made under the fixed option
plans for the current and prior year:
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Wtd-average
risk-free interest rate
|
4.1
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
2.6
|
%
|
||||
Expected
life of option (years)
|
4.7
|
4.0
|
4.2
|
|||||||
Expected
stock volatility
|
26.2
|
%
|
34.0
|
%
|
34.0
|
%
|
||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.09
|
%
|
0.11
|
%
|
0.13
|
%
|
The
Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models
require the input of somewhat subjective assumptions including expected stock
price volatility. Prior to 2005, the Company relied exclusively on historical
volatility as an input for determining the estimated fair value of stock
options. For 2005, the Company relied on observations of both historical
volatility trends as well as implied future volatility observations as
determined by independent third parties. For 2005 stock option grants, the
Company utilized expected volatility based on the expected life of the option,
but within a range of 25% to 27%. In determining the expected life of the
option
grants, the Company has observed the actual terms of prior grants with similar
characteristics, the actual vesting schedule of the grant, and assessed the
expected risk tolerance of different optionee groups. The risk-free interest
rates used, which were actual U.S. Treasury zero-coupon rates for bonds matching
the expected term of the option as of the option grant date, ranged from
3.37% to 4.47% for 2005, 2.16% to 4.62% for 2004, and 1.82% to 4.10% for
2003.
The
fair value of options granted under the fixed option plans
during 2005 ranged from $2.90 to $6.79, with a weighted-average fair value
of
$4.49. The fair value of options granted under the fixed option plans during
2004 ranged from $3.45 to $7.83, with a weighted-average fair value of $4.49.
The fair value of options granted under the fixed option plans during 2003
ranged from $3.33 to $8.17, with a weighted-average fair value of $4.28
Aggregated
information regarding the Company’s fixed stock option
plans is summarized below:
COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING PLANS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Options
(000)
|
Wtd.
average exercise price
|
|
Wtd.
average remaining contractual
term
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
(millions)
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2002
|
104,020
|
$
|
9.51
|
|||||||||||||
Granted
|
26,674
|
13.53
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(7,422
|
)
|
6.78
|
|||||||||||||
Surrendered
|
(3,214
|
)
|
12.67
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2003
|
120,058
|
10.47
|
||||||||||||||
Granted
|
14,131
|
14.41
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(7,222
|
)
|
6.59
|
|||||||||||||
Surrendered
|
(6,264
|
)
|
13.62
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2004
|
120,703
|
10.98
|
||||||||||||||
Granted
|
1,697
|
14.91
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(14,739
|
)
|
6.13
|
|||||||||||||
Surrendered
|
(2,417
|
)
|
13.89
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2005
|
105,244
|
$
|
11.65
|
4.5
|
$
|
503
|
||||||||||
Vested
or expected to vest at Dec. 31, 2005
|
97,957
|
$
|
11.47
|
4.5
|
$
|
352
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at Dec. 31, 2005
|
76,283
|
$
|
10.73
|
4.0
|
$
|
435
|
OTHER
EMPLOYEE PLANS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Options
(000)
|
Wtd.
average exercise price
|
|
Wtd.
average remaining contractual
term
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
(millions)
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2002
|
34,152
|
$
|
11.47
|
|||||||||||||
Granted
|
4,770
|
14.63
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(3,318
|
)
|
7.95
|
|||||||||||||
Surrendered
|
(1,052
|
)
|
13.57
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2003
|
34,552
|
12.21
|
||||||||||||||
Granted
|
4,255
|
15.05
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(3,133
|
)
|
6.79
|
|||||||||||||
Surrendered
|
(1,453
|
)
|
14.54
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2004
|
34,221
|
12.94
|
||||||||||||||
Granted
|
6,662
|
15.60
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(3,800
|
)
|
7.09
|
|||||||||||||
Surrendered
|
(1,263
|
)
|
15.60
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2005
|
35,820
|
$
|
13.96
|
5.8
|
$
|
89
|
||||||||||
Vested
or expected to vest at Dec. 31, 2005
|
34,412
|
$
|
13.93
|
5.8
|
$
|
65
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at Dec. 31, 2005
|
20,395
|
$
|
13.78
|
5.1
|
$
|
54
|
The
total aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during
2005, 2004, and 2003 was $179 million, $106 million, and $121 million,
respectively. The total fair value of shares vesting during 2005, 2004, and
2003
was $96 million, $114 million, and $87 million, respectively. As of December
31,
2005, there was $148 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to
share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized
over a
weighted-average period of 2.0 years. The total recognition period for the
remaining unrecognized compensation cost is approximately ten years; however,
the majority of this cost will be recognized over the next two years, in
accordance with vesting provisions.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
At
December 31, 2005, under the amended 1991 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (ESPP), which has been approved by shareholders, the Company
is
authorized to issue up to a remaining balance of 2.0 million shares of common
stock to Employees of the Company. These shares may be issued at a price
equal
to 90 percent of the market value at the end of each monthly purchase period.
Common stock purchases are paid for through periodic payroll deductions.
For
2005, 2004, and 2003, participants under the plan purchased 1.5 million shares,
1.5 million shares, and 1.4 million shares at average prices of $13.19, $13.47,
and $14.04, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of each purchase
right
under the ESPP granted for 2005, 2004, and 2003, which is equal to the ten
percent discount from the market value of the common stock at the end of
each
monthly purchase period, was $1.47, $1.50, and $1.56, respectively.
Non-Employee
Director grants and Incentive Plan
During
the term of the 1996 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (1996
Plan), upon initial election to the Board, non-Employee Directors receive
a
one-time option grant to purchase 10,000 shares of Southwest Common Stock
at the
fair market value of such stock on the date of the grant. The Company’s 1996
Plan, which is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, is set to expire in second quarter 2006, after which no additional
options may be granted from the plan. Outstanding stock options to the Board
under the 1996 Plan become exercisable over a period of five years from the
grant date and have a term of 10 years.
In
2001, the Board adopted the Southwest Airlines Co. Outside
Director Incentive Plan. The purpose of the plan is to align more closely
the
interests of the non-Employee Directors with those of the Company’s Shareholders
and to provide the non-Employee Directors with retirement income. To accomplish
this purpose, the plan compensates each non-Employee Director based on the
performance of the Company’s Common Stock and defers the receipt of such
compensation until after the non-Employee Director ceases to be a Director
of
the Company. Pursuant to the plan, on the date of the 2002 Annual Meeting
of
Shareholders, the Company granted 750 non-transferable Performance Shares
to
each non-Employee Director who had served as a Director since at least May
2001.
Thereafter, on the date of each Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Company
will
grant 750 Performance Shares to each non-Employee Director who has served
since
the previous Annual Meeting. A Performance Share is a unit of value equal
to the
Fair Market Value of a share of Southwest Common Stock, based on the average
closing sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange during a specified period. On the 30th calendar day
following the date a non-Employee Director ceases to serve as a Director
of the
Company for any reason, Southwest will pay to such non-Employee Director
an
amount equal to the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock during the 30 days
preceding such last date of service multiplied by the number of Performance
Shares then held by such Director. The plan contains provisions contemplating
adjustments on changes in capitalization of the Company. The Company accounts
for grants made under this plan as liability awards, as defined, and since
the
awards are not stock options, they are not reflected in the above tables.
The fair value of the awards as of December 31, 2005, which is not material
to
the Company, is included in Accrued liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
Taxes
A
portion of the Company’s granted options qualify as incentive
stock options (ISO) for income tax purposes. As such, a tax benefit is not
recorded at the time the compensation cost related to the options is recorded
for book purposes due to the fact that an ISO does not ordinarily result
in a
tax benefit unless there is a disqualifying disposition. Stock option grants
of
non-qualified options result in the creation of a deferred tax asset, which
is a
temporary difference, until the time that the option in exercised. Due to
the
treatment of incentive stock options for tax purposes, the Company’s effective
tax rate from year to year is subject to variability.
13.
EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS
Defined
contribution plans
The
Company has defined contribution plans covering substantially
all Southwest Employees. The Southwest Airlines Co. Profitsharing Plan is
a
money purchase defined contribution plan and Employee stock purchase plan.
The
Company also sponsors Employee savings plans under section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code, which include Company matching contributions. The
401(k)
plans cover substantially all Employees. Contributions under all defined
contribution plans are primarily based on Employee compensation and performance
of the Company.
Company
contributions to all retirement plans expensed in 2005,
2004, and 2003 were $264 million, $200 million, and $219 million, respectively.
Postretirement
benefit plans
The
Company provides postretirement benefits to qualified retirees
in the form of medical and dental coverage. Employees must meet minimum levels
of service and age requirements as set forth by the Company, or as specified
in
collective bargaining agreements with specific workgroups. Employees meeting
these requirements, as defined, may use accrued sick time to pay for medical
and
dental premiums from the age of retirement until age 65.
The
following table shows the change in the Company’s accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) for the years ended December 31,
2005
and 2004:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
APBO
at beginning of period
|
$
|
80
|
$
|
77
|
|||
Service
cost
|
12
|
10
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
4
|
5
|
|||||
Benefits
paid
|
(2
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
-
|
(11
|
)
|
||||
Plan
amendments
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
APBO
at end of period
|
$
|
94
|
$
|
80
|
During
first quarter 2004, the Company closed its Reservations
Centers located in Dallas, Texas, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Little Rock,
Arkansas. In excess of 1,000 Employees at these locations did not elect to
relocate to the Company’s remaining centers and, instead, accepted severance
packages offered by the Company. See Note 8 for further information. Also
during
2004, the Company offered an early-out option to substantially all Employees,
primarily in an effort to alleviate overstaffing in certain areas of the
Company. As a result of the reduction in headcount associated with these
events,
the Company remeasured its benefit obligation, resulting in the 2004 gain.
The
assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the Company’s plan. A one-percent change in all
healthcare cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO at December 31, 2005,
would have the following effects:
(In
millions)
|
1%
increase
|
1%
decrease
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Increase
(decrease) in total service and interest
costs
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Increase
(decrease) in the APBO
|
$
|
7
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
The
Company’s plans are unfunded, and benefits are paid as they
become due. For 2005, both benefits paid and Company contributions to the
plans
were each $2 million. For 2004, both benefits paid and Company contributions
to
the plans were each $1 million. Estimated future benefit payments expected
to be
paid for each of the next five years are $4 million in 2006, $6 million in
2007,
$8 million in 2008, $10 million in 2009, $12 million in 2010, and $84 million
for the next five years thereafter.
The
following table shows the calculation of the accrued
postretirement benefit cost recognized in “Other deferred liabilities” on the
Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2005 and 2004:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Funded
status
|
$
|
(94
|
)
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Unrecognized
net actuarial loss
|
6
|
4
|
|||||
Unrecognized
prior service cost
|
4
|
8
|
|||||
Cost
recognized on Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
The
Company’s periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, included the following:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
12
|
$
|
10
|
$
|
9
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||
Recognized
actuarial loss
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Net
periodic postretirement benefit cost
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
16
|
Unrecognized
prior service cost is expensed using a straight-line
amortization of the cost over the average future service of Employees expected
to receive benefits under the plan. The Company used the following actuarial
assumptions to account for its postretirement benefit plans at December
31:
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Wtd-average
discount rate
|
5.25
|
%
|
6.25
|
%
|
6.75
|
%
|
||||
Assumed
healthcare cost trend rate (1)
|
9.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
||||
(1)
The assumed healthcare cost trend rate is assumed to
decrease to 8.50% for 2006, then decline gradually
|
||||||||||
to
5% by 2013 and remain level thereafter.
|
14.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The components
of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2005 and 2004, are
as
follows:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
DEFERRED
TAX LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Accelerated
depreciation
|
$
|
2,251
|
$
|
2,027
|
|||
Fuel
hedges
|
564
|
264
|
|||||
Other
|
3
|
11
|
|||||
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
2,818
|
2,302
|
|||||
DEFERRED
TAX ASSETS:
|
|||||||
Deferred
gains from sale and
|
|||||||
leaseback
of aircraft
|
76
|
83
|
|||||
Capital
and operating leases
|
70
|
73
|
|||||
Accrued
employee benefits
|
132
|
110
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
128
|
120
|
|||||
State
taxes
|
57
|
52
|
|||||
Net
operating loss carry forward
|
164
|
186
|
|||||
Other
|
21
|
53
|
|||||
Total
deferred tax assets
|
648
|
677
|
|||||
Net
deferred tax liability
|
$
|
2,170
|
$
|
1,625
|
The
provision for income taxes is composed of the following:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
CURRENT:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
43
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
$
|
71
|
|||
State
|
7
|
-
|
9
|
|||||||
Total
current
|
50
|
(20
|
)
|
80
|
||||||
DEFERRED:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
231
|
140
|
142
|
|||||||
State
|
14
|
4
|
9
|
|||||||
Total
deferred
|
245
|
144
|
151
|
|||||||
|
$
|
295
|
$
|
124
|
$
|
231
|
For
the year 2004, Southwest Airlines Co. had a tax net operating
loss of $616 million for federal income tax purposes. The Company carried
a
portion of this net operating loss back to prior periods, resulting in a
$35
million refund of federal taxes previously paid. This refund was received
during
2005. The Company applied a portion of this 2004 net operating loss to the
2005
tax year, resulting in the payment of no federal taxes for this year. The
$43
million current tax provision relates to the tax benefit of stock options
exercised during 2005. The remaining portion of the Company’s federal net
operating loss that can be carried forward to future years is estimated at
$453
million, and expires in 2024.
The
effective tax rate on income before income taxes differed from
the federal income tax statutory rate for the following reasons:
(In
millions)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
Tax
at statutory
|
||||||||||
U.S.
tax rates
|
$
|
274
|
$
|
123
|
$
|
213
|
||||
Nondeductible
items
|
8
|
7
|
7
|
|||||||
State
income taxes,
|
||||||||||
net
of federal benefit
|
14
|
3
|
12
|
|||||||
Other,
net
|
(1
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Total
income
|
||||||||||
tax
provision
|
$
|
295
|
$
|
124
|
$
|
231
|
The
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regularly examines the
Company’s federal income tax returns and, in the course of which, may propose
adjustments to the Company’s federal income tax liability reported on such
returns. It is the Company’s practice to vigorously contest those proposed
adjustments that it deems lacking of merit. The Company's management does
not
expect that the outcome of any proposed adjustments presented to date by
the
IRS, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on
the
Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
15.
NET INCOME PER SHARE
The
following table sets forth the computation of net income per
share, basic and diluted:
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
484
|
$
|
215
|
$
|
372
|
||||
Weighted-average
shares
|
||||||||||
outstanding,
basic
|
789
|
783
|
783
|
|||||||
Dilutive
effect of Employee
|
||||||||||
stock
options
|
17
|
21
|
27
|
|||||||
Adjusted
weighted-average
|
||||||||||
shares
outstanding, diluted
|
806
|
804
|
810
|
|||||||
Net
income per share, basic
|
$
|
.61
|
$
|
.27
|
$
|
.48
|
||||
Net
income per share, diluted
|
$
|
.60
|
$
|
.27
|
$
|
.46
|
The
Company has excluded 12 million, 31 million, and 10 million
shares from its calculations of net income per share, diluted, in 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively, as they represent antidilutive stock options for
the
respective periods presented.
16.
FEDERAL GRANT
On
April 16, 2003, as a result of the United States war with Iraq,
the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act (Wartime Act) was signed
into law. Among other items, the legislation included a $2.3 billion government
grant for airlines. Southwest received $271 million as its proportional share
of
the grant during second quarter 2003. This amount is included in “Other (gains)
losses” in the accompanying Consolidated Income Statement for 2003. Also as part
of the Wartime Act, the Company received approximately $5 million as a
reimbursement for the direct cost of reinforcing cockpit doors on all of
the
Company’s aircraft. The Company accounted for this reimbursement as a reduction
of capitalized property and equipment.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Southwest
Airlines Co.
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Southwest Airlines Co. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on
our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Southwest Airlines Co. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years
in the
period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As
discussed in Note 1, the Company changed its method of
accounting for scheduled airframe maintenance and share-based compensation.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness
of
Southwest Airlines Co.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated January 30, 2006 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Dallas,
Texas
January
30, 2006, except for Note 1 - “Changes in
Accounting,”
as
to which the date is August 9, 2006.