10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on April 23, 2007
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 or
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ________ to ________
Commission
File No. 1-7259

Southwest
Airlines Co.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS
|
74-1563240
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
P.O.
Box 36611, Dallas, Texas
|
75235-1611
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (214)
792-4000
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes
þ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer þ Accelerated
filer ¨ Non-accelerated
filer ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨ No
þ
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Number
of
shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on April 18,
2007:
780,832,895
1
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
SOUTHWEST
AIRLINES CO.
FORM
10-Q
SOUTHWEST
AIRLINES CO.
FORM
10-Q
Part
I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
Southwest
Airlines Co.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in
millions)
(unaudited)
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,618
|
$
|
1,390
|
|||
Short-term
investments
|
315
|
369
|
|||||
Accounts
and other receivables
|
278
|
241
|
|||||
Inventories
of parts and supplies, at cost
|
174
|
181
|
|||||
Fuel
derivative contracts
|
558
|
369
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
56
|
51
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
2,999
|
2,601
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, at cost:
|
|||||||
Flight
equipment
|
12,041
|
11,769
|
|||||
Ground
property and equipment
|
1,384
|
1,356
|
|||||
Deposits
on flight equipment purchase contracts
|
757
|
734
|
|||||
14,182
|
13,859
|
||||||
Less
allowance for depreciation and amortization
|
3,897
|
3,765
|
|||||
10,285
|
10,094
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
954
|
765
|
|||||
$
|
14,238
|
$
|
13,460
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
643
|
$
|
643
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,748
|
1,323
|
|||||
Air
traffic liability
|
1,010
|
799
|
|||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
123
|
122
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
3,524
|
2,887
|
|||||
Long-term
debt less current maturities
|
1,556
|
1,567
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,183
|
2,104
|
|||||
Deferred
gains from sale and leaseback of aircraft
|
117
|
120
|
|||||
Other
deferred liabilities
|
304
|
333
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock
|
808
|
808
|
|||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
1,155
|
1,142
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
4,264
|
4,307
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
716
|
582
|
|||||
Treasury
stock, at cost
|
(389
|
)
|
(390
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
6,554
|
6,449
|
|||||
$
|
14,238
|
$
|
13,460
|
||||
See
accompanying notes.
|
Southwest
Airlines Co.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income
(in
millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES:
|
|||||||
Passenger
|
$
|
2,112
|
$
|
1,938
|
|||
Freight
|
30
|
35
|
|||||
Other
|
56
|
46
|
|||||
Total
operating revenues
|
2,198
|
2,019
|
|||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|||||||
Salaries,
wages, and benefits
|
767
|
716
|
|||||
Fuel
and oil
|
564
|
501
|
|||||
Maintenance
materials and repairs
|
136
|
104
|
|||||
Aircraft
rentals
|
39
|
40
|
|||||
Landing
fees and other rentals
|
136
|
120
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
135
|
124
|
|||||
Other
operating expenses
|
337
|
316
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
2,114
|
1,921
|
|||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
84
|
98
|
|||||
OTHER
EXPENSES (INCOME):
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
29
|
34
|
|||||
Capitalized
interest
|
(13
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
(13
|
)
|
(18
|
)
|
|||
Other
(gains) losses, net
|
(68
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
Total
other expenses (income)
|
(65
|
)
|
2
|
||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
149
|
96
|
|||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
56
|
35
|
|||||
NET
INCOME
|
$
|
93
|
$
|
61
|
|||
NET
INCOME PER SHARE, BASIC
|
$
|
.12
|
$
|
.08
|
|||
NET
INCOME PER SHARE, DILUTED
|
$
|
.12
|
$
|
.07
|
|||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE SHARES
|
|||||||
OUTSTANDING:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
786
|
803
|
|||||
Diluted
|
800
|
836
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes.
|
Southwest
Airlines Co.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(in
millions)
(unaudited)
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
93
|
$
|
61
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to
|
|||||||
cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
135
|
124
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
42
|
35
|
|||||
Amortization
of deferred gains on sale and
|
|||||||
leaseback
of aircraft
|
(4
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
|||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
13
|
22
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
(29
|
)
|
(28
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in certain assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
and other receivables
|
(37
|
)
|
(13
|
)
|
|||
Other
current assets
|
(56
|
)
|
14
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
383
|
317
|
|||||
Air
traffic liability
|
210
|
280
|
|||||
Other
|
(133
|
)
|
(57
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
617
|
751
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment, net
|
(325
|
)
|
(262
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of short-term investments
|
(914
|
)
|
(850
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sales of short-term investments
|
968
|
782
|
|||||
Proceeds
from ATA Airlines, Inc. debtor in possession loan
|
-
|
20
|
|||||
Other
|
-
|
1
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(271
|
)
|
(309
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from Employee stock plans
|
78
|
107
|
|||||
Payments
of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
(9
|
)
|
(37
|
)
|
|||
Payments
of cash dividends
|
(7
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
(209
|
)
|
(214
|
)
|
|||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
29
|
28
|
|||||
Other
|
-
|
1
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(118
|
)
|
(122
|
)
|
|||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|||||||
AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
228
|
320
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
|
|||||||
BEGINNING
OF PERIOD
|
1,390
|
2,280
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|||||||
AT
END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
1,618
|
$
|
2,600
|
|||
CASH
PAYMENTS FOR:
|
|||||||
Interest,
net of amount capitalized
|
$
|
19
|
$
|
20
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
-
|
|||
See
accompanying notes.
|
Southwest
Airlines Co.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. BASIS
OF
PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Southwest
Airlines Co. (Company or Southwest) have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for the interim periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
include all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary
for a
fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. This includes all
normal and recurring adjustments, but does
not
include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. Financial results
for
the Company, and airlines in general, are seasonal in nature. Historically,
the
Company’s second and third fiscal quarters have been more profitable than its
first and fourth fiscal quarters. However, as a result of the extensive nature
of the Company’s fuel hedging program, the volatility of commodities used by the
Company for hedging jet fuel, and the unique accounting requirements of SFAS
133, as amended, the Company has experienced significant volatility in its
results in all fiscal periods. See Note 5 for further information. Operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2007, are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December
31,
2007. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Southwest Airlines Co. Annual Report
on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
presentation. In
the
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended
March 31, 2006, “Purchases of short-term investments” and “Proceeds from sales
of short-term investments” are shown as gross amounts instead of being netted
into a single line item within investing activities.
2. SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
The
Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R,
“Share-Based Payment,” which was adopted January 1, 2006, utilizing the modified
retrospective transition method.
Stock
Option Plans
The
Company has stock option plans covering Employees subject to collective
bargaining agreements (collective bargaining plans) and stock plans covering
Employees not subject to collective bargaining agreements (other Employee
plans).
None of
the collective bargaining plans were required to be approved by shareholders.
Options granted to Employees under collective bargaining plans are
non-qualified, granted at or above the fair market value of the Company’s Common
Stock on the date of grant, and generally have terms ranging from six to twelve
years. Neither Executive Officers nor members of the Company’s Board of
Directors are eligible to participate in any of these collective bargaining
plans. Options granted to Employees through other Employee plans are both
qualified as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
and
non-qualified stock options, granted at the fair market value of the Company’s
Common
Stock on the date of grant, and have ten-year terms. All of the options included
in the Company’s definition of
other
Employee Plans have been approved by Shareholders, except the plan covering
non-management, non-contract Employees, which had
options
outstanding to purchase 5.4
million
shares
of the Company’s Common Stock as of March 31, 2007. Although the Company does
not have a formal policy per se, upon option exercise, the Company will
typically issue Treasury stock, to the extent such shares are available.
Vesting
terms for the collective bargaining plans differ based on the grant made, and
have ranged in length from immediate vesting to vesting periods in accordance
with the period covered by the respective collective bargaining agreement.
For
other Employee Plans, as defined, options vest
and
become fully exercisable over three, five, or ten years of continued employment,
depending upon the grant type. For grants in any of the Company’s plans that are
subject to graded vesting over a service period, we recognize expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
None
of the Company’s grants include performance-based or market-based vesting
conditions, as defined.
The
fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a modified
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model
was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options
that
have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option
valuation models require the input of somewhat subjective assumptions including
expected stock price volatility. During the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006, there were .2 million and .2 million stock options granted under
the
Company’s plans related to collective bargaining agreements, respectively. The
fair value of options granted under these plans during the three months ended
March 31, 2007, ranged from $3.26 to $6.33, with a weighted-average fair value
of $3.82. The fair value of options granted under these plans during the three
months ended March 31, 2006, ranged from $4.26 to $6.99, with a weighted-average
fair value of $4.96. There were no stock options granted from other Employee
Plans during the three months ended March 31, 2007. During the three months
ended March 31, 2006, there were 2.8 million stock options granted from the
Company’s other Employee Plans. The fair value of options granted under these
plans during the three months ended March 31, 2006, ranged from $4.63 to $6.73,
with a weighted-average fair value of $5.81.
The
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006 reflects share-based compensation cost of $13 million
and $22 million, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized from share-based
compensation arrangements for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
was $4 million and $6 million, respectively.
The
Company currently estimates that share-based compensation expense will be
approximately $40 million for the full year 2007, before income taxes and
profitsharing.
As
of
March 31, 2007, there was $62 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years. The total recognition
period for the remaining unrecognized compensation cost is approximately nine
years; however, the majority of this cost will be recognized over the next
two
years, in accordance with vesting provisions.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under
the
amended 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), which has been approved by
shareholders, the Company is authorized to issue up to a remaining balance
of
7.5
million shares of Common Stock to Employees of the Company. These shares may
be
issued at a price equal to 90 percent of the market value at the end of each
monthly purchase period. Common Stock purchases are paid for through periodic
payroll deductions. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
participants under the plan purchased .3 million shares and .3 million shares
at
average prices of $13.67 and $14.86, respectively. The weighted-average fair
value of each purchase right under the ESPP granted for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, which is equal to the ten percent discount from the
market value of the Common Stock at the end of each monthly purchase period,
was
$1.52 and $1.65, respectively.
Non-Employee
Director grants and Incentive Plan
During
the term of the Company’s 1996 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (1996 Plan), upon
initial election to the Board, non-Employee Directors received a one-time option
grant to purchase 10,000 shares of Southwest Common Stock at the fair market
value of such stock on the date of the grant. The 1996 Plan, which is
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, has
expired and no additional options may be granted from the plan. Outstanding
stock options to the Board under the 1996 Plan become exercisable over a period
of five years from the grant date and have a term of 10 years.
In
2001,
the Board adopted the Southwest Airlines Co. Outside Director Incentive Plan.
The purpose of the plan is to align more closely the interests of the
non-Employee Directors with those of the Company’s Shareholders and to provide
the non-Employee Directors with retirement income. To accomplish this purpose,
the plan compensates each non-Employee Director based on the performance of
the
Company’s Common Stock and defers the receipt of such compensation until after
the non-Employee Director ceases to be a Director of the Company. Pursuant
to
the plan, on the date of the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Company
granted 750 non-transferable Performance Shares to each non-Employee Director
who had served as a Director since at least May 2001. Thereafter, on the date
of
each Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Company has granted 750 Performance
Shares to each non-Employee Director who has served since the previous Annual
Meeting. These annual grants are set to increase to 1,000 shares effective
with
the May 2007 Annual Meeting. A Performance Share is a unit of value equal to
the
Fair Market Value of a share of Southwest Common Stock, based on the average
closing sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange during a specified period. On the 30th
calendar
day following the date a non-Employee Director ceases to serve as a Director
of
the Company for any reason, Southwest will pay to such non-Employee Director
an
amount equal to the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock during the 30 days
preceding such last date of service multiplied by the number of Performance
Shares then held by such Director. The plan contains provisions contemplating
adjustments on changes in capitalization of the Company. The Company accounts
for grants made under this plan as liability awards, as defined. The fair
value of the awards as of March 31, 2007, which is not material to the Company,
is included in Accrued liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
Taxes
A
portion
of the Company’s granted options qualify as incentive stock options (ISO) for
income tax purposes. As such, a tax benefit is not recorded at the time the
compensation cost related to the options is recorded for book purposes due
to
the fact that an ISO does not ordinarily result in a tax benefit unless there
is
a disqualifying disposition. Stock option grants of non-qualified options result
in the creation of a deferred tax asset, which is a temporary difference, until
the time the option is exercised. Due to the treatment of incentive stock
options for tax purposes, the Company’s effective tax rate is subject to
variability.
3. DIVIDENDS
During
the three month period ended March 31, 2007, dividends of $.0045 per share
were
declared on the 787 million shares of Common Stock then outstanding. During
the
three month period ended March 31, 2006, dividends of $.0045 per share were
declared on the 803 million shares of Common Stock then
outstanding.
4. NET
INCOME PER SHARE
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income
per
share (in millions except per share amounts):
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
NUMERATOR:
|
|||||||
Net
income available to
|
|||||||
common
shareholders
|
$
|
93
|
$
|
61
|
|||
DENOMINATOR:
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
shares
|
|||||||
outstanding,
basic
|
786
|
803
|
|||||
Dilutive
effect of Employee stock
|
|||||||
options
|
14
|
33
|
|||||
Adjusted
weighted-average shares
|
|||||||
outstanding,
diluted
|
800
|
836
|
|||||
NET
INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
.12
|
$
|
.08
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
.12
|
$
|
.07
|
|||
|
5. FINANCIAL
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Fuel
Contracts
Airline
operators are inherently dependent upon energy to operate and, therefore, are
impacted by changes in jet fuel prices. Jet fuel and oil consumed for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 represented approximately 26.7 percent
and
26.1 percent of Southwest’s operating expenses, respectively. In both years, jet
fuel costs were the second largest expense incurred by the Company, following
only salaries, wages, and benefits. For some airlines, jet fuel costs have
become the largest single expense incurred on the income statement. The Company
endeavors to acquire jet fuel at the lowest possible cost. Because jet fuel
is
not traded on an organized futures exchange, liquidity for hedging is limited.
However, the Company has found commodities for hedging of jet fuel costs,
primarily crude oil, and refined products such as heating oil and unleaded
gasoline. The Company utilizes financial derivative instruments to decrease
its
exposure to jet fuel price increases. The Company does not purchase or hold
any
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
The
Company has utilized financial derivative instruments for both short-term and
long-term time frames. In addition to the significant protective fuel derivative
positions the Company had in place during the first three months of 2007, the
Company also has significant future positions. The Company currently has a
mixture of purchased call options, collar structures, and fixed price swap
agreements in place to provide protection for over 90 percent of its remaining
2007 total anticipated jet fuel requirements at average crude oil equivalent
prices of approximately $50 per barrel, and has also added refinery margins
on
most of those positions. Based on current growth plans, the Company is also
approximately 65 percent protected for 2008 at approximately $49 per barrel,
over 50 percent protected for 2009 at approximately $51 per barrel, over 25
percent protected for 2010 at approximately $63 per barrel, and has modest
positions in 2011 and 2012.
Upon
proper qualification, the Company accounts for its fuel derivative instruments
as cash flow hedges, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as
amended (SFAS 133). Under SFAS 133, all derivatives designated as hedges that
meet certain requirements are granted special hedge accounting treatment.
Generally, utilizing the special hedge accounting, all periodic changes in
fair
value of the derivatives designated as hedges that are considered to be
effective, as defined, are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive income"
until the underlying jet fuel is consumed. See Note 6 for further information
on
Accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company is exposed to the risk
that
periodic changes will not be effective, as defined, or that the derivatives
will
no longer qualify for special hedge accounting. Ineffectiveness, as defined,
results when the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument exceeds
the change in the value of the Company’s expected future cash outlay to purchase
and consume jet fuel. To the extent that the periodic changes in the fair value
of the derivatives are not effective, that ineffectiveness is recorded to Other
gains and losses in the income statement. Likewise, if a hedge ceases to qualify
for hedge accounting, any change in the fair value of derivative instruments
since the last period are recorded to Other gains and losses in the income
statement in the period of the change.
Ineffectiveness
is inherent in hedging jet fuel with derivative positions based in other crude
oil related commodities, especially given the magnitude of the current fair
market value of the Company’s fuel derivatives and the recent volatility in the
prices of refined products. Due to the volatility in markets for crude oil
and
related products, the Company is unable to predict the amount of ineffectiveness
each period, including the loss of hedge accounting, which could be determined
on a derivative by derivative basis or in the aggregate. This may result, and
has resulted, in increased volatility in the Company’s results. The significant
increase in the amount of hedge ineffectiveness and unrealized gains and losses
on derivative contracts settling in future periods recorded during 2005 through
first quarter 2007 has been due to a number of factors. These factors included:
the significant fluctuation in energy prices, the number of derivative positions
the Company holds, significant weather events that have affected refinery
capacity and the production of refined products, and the volatility of the
different types of products the Company uses for protection. The number of
instances in which the Company has discontinued hedge accounting for specific
hedges and for specific refined products, such as unleaded gasoline, has
increased recently, primarily due to these reasons. In these cases, the Company
has determined that the hedges will not regain effectiveness in the time period
remaining until settlement and therefore must discontinue special hedge
accounting, as defined by SFAS 133. When this happens, any changes in fair
value
of the derivative instruments are marked to market through earnings in the
period of change. However, even though these derivatives may not meet the strict
requirements to qualify for SFAS 133 special hedge accounting, the Company
continues to hold the instruments as it believes they continue to represent
good
“economic hedges” in its goal to minimize jet fuel costs. As the fair value of
the Company’s hedge positions increases in amount, there is a higher degree of
probability that there will be continued variability recorded in the income
statement and that the amount of hedge ineffectiveness and unrealized gains
or
losses for changes in value of the derivatives recorded in future periods will
be material. This is primarily due to the fact that small differences in the
correlation of crude oil related products are leveraged over large dollar
volumes.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recognized approximately
$83
million of net gains in Other (gains) losses, net, related to the
ineffectiveness of its hedges and the loss of hedge accounting for certain
fuel
derivatives, coupled with the overall increase in fair value of the Company’s
fuel derivative instruments. Of this net total, approximately $85 million was
unrealized, mark-to-market gains in the fair value of certain derivatives that
will settle in future periods that no longer qualified for special hedge
accounting, and $4 million was ineffectiveness and mark-to-market gains related
to contracts that settled during first quarter 2007. These were partially offset
by $6 million in losses related to unrealized ineffectiveness from hedges
designated for future periods. During the three months ended March 31, 2006,
the
Company recognized approximately $13 million of additional net gains in Other
(gains) losses, net, related to the ineffectiveness of its hedges and the loss
of hedge accounting for certain fuel derivatives. This total amount consisted
of
approximately $40 million in gains from unrealized, mark-to-market changes
in
the fair value of derivatives due to the discontinuation of hedge accounting
for
certain contracts that will settle in future periods, partially offset by $10
million in ineffectiveness expense and mark-to-market losses associated with
contracts that settled during first quarter 2006, and $17 million in losses
related to unrealized ineffectiveness from hedges designated for future periods.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized
approximately $14 million and $11 million of net expense, respectively, related
to amounts excluded from the Company's measurements of hedge effectiveness,
in
Other (gains) losses, net. These amounts represent the premium costs of option
and collar contracts expiring during those respective periods.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company
recognized gains in Fuel and oil expense of $79 million and $116 million,
respectively, from hedging activities. At March 31, 2007, approximately $35
million due from third parties from settled derivative contracts is included
in
Accounts and other receivables in the accompanying unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Company's financial derivative
instruments at March 31, 2007, was a net asset of approximately $1.4 billion.
The current portion of these financial derivative instruments, $558 million,
is
classified as Fuel hedge contracts and the long-term portion, $819 million,
is
classified as Other assets in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. The
fair
value of the derivative instruments, depending on the type of instrument, was
determined by the use of present value methods or standard option value models
with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying
markets.
As
of
March
31,
2007, the Company had approximately $719 million in unrealized gains, net of
tax, in Accumulated other comprehensive income related to fuel hedges. Included
in this total are approximately $319 million in net unrealized gains that are
expected to be realized in earnings during the twelve months following March
31,
2007.
Interest
Rate Swaps
Prior
to
2007, the Company had entered into interest rate swap agreements relating to
its
$350 million 5.25% senior unsecured notes due 2014 and its $385 million 6.5%
senior unsecured notes due 2012. During first quarter 2007, the Company executed
interest rate swap agreements relating to its $300 million 5.125% senior
unsecured notes due 2017 and its $100 million 7.375% senior unsecured notes
due
2027. Under each of these interest rate swap agreements, the Company pays the
London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin every six months on the
notional amount of the debt, and receives the fixed stated rate of the notes
every six months until the date the notes become due.
The
Company’s interest rate swap agreements qualify as fair value hedges, as defined
by SFAS 133. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements, which are
adjusted regularly, are recorded in the Company’s balance sheet as an asset or
liability, as necessary, with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying
value of the long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swap
agreements, excluding accrued interest, at March 31, 2007, was a liability
of
approximately $30 million. This entire amount is recorded in Other deferred
liabilities in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. In accordance
with fair value hedging, the offsetting entry is an adjustment to decrease
the
carrying value of long-term debt.
6. COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
Comprehensive
income included changes in the fair value of certain financial derivative
instruments, which qualify for hedge accounting, and unrealized gains and losses
on certain investments. Comprehensive income totaled $227
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and $178 million for the
three
months ended March 31, 2006. The differences between net income and
comprehensive income for each of these periods were as follows (in
millions):
Three
months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
93
|
$
|
61
|
||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on derivative instruments,
|
||||||||
net
of deferred taxes of $84 and $72
|
135
|
116
|
||||||
Other,
net of deferred taxes of $0 and $1
|
(1
|
)
|
1
|
|||||
Total
other comprehensive income
|
134
|
117
|
||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
227
|
$
|
178
|
A
rollforward of the amounts included in Accumulated other comprehensive income,
net of taxes, is shown below (in millions):
Accumulated
|
|||||||||
Fuel
|
other
|
||||||||
hedge
|
comprehensive
|
||||||||
derivatives
|
Other
|
income
(loss)
|
|||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
$
|
584
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
582
|
||
2007
changes in value
|
174
|
(1
|
)
|
173
|
|||||
Reclassification
to earnings
|
(39
|
)
|
-
|
(39
|
|||||
Balance
at March 31, 2007
|
$
|
719
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
716
|
7. OTHER
ASSETS AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES (in millions)
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Noncurrent
fuel derivatives contracts, at fair value
|
$
|
819
|
$
|
630
|
||
Other
|
135
|
135
|
||||
Other
assets
|
$
|
954
|
$
|
765
|
||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Retirement
Plans
|
$
|
174
|
$
|
165
|
||
Aircraft
Rentals
|
109
|
128
|
||||
Vacation
Pay
|
156
|
151
|
||||
Advances
and deposits
|
885
|
546
|
||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
125
|
78
|
||||
Other
|
299
|
255
|
||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
$
|
1,748
|
$
|
1,323
|
8. POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFITS
The
following table sets forth the Company’s periodic postretirement benefit cost
for each of the interim periods identified:
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
(In
millions)
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
||||
|
|
|
|||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
4
|
$
|
4
|
|||
Interest
cost
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Recognized
actuarial loss
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Net
periodic postretirement benefit cost
|
$
|
5
|
$
|
5
|
9. CONTINGENCIES
The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the
ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, examinations by
the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS regularly examines the Company’s federal
income tax returns and, in the course thereof, proposes adjustments to the
Company’s federal income tax liability reported on such returns. It is the
Company’s practice to vigorously contest those proposed adjustments it deems
lacking of merit.
The
Company's management does not expect that the outcome in any of its currently
ongoing legal proceedings or the outcome of any proposed adjustments presented
to date by the IRS, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash
flow.
10. RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ratified the
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-3
“How Taxes Collected From Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities
Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net
Presentation)” (EITF 06-3). The scope of EITF 06-3 includes any tax assessed by
a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing
transaction between a seller and a customer, and provides that a company may
adopt a policy of presenting taxes either gross within revenue or on a net
basis. For any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, a company should
disclose the amounts of those taxes for each period for which an income
statement is presented if those amounts are significant. This statement is
effective to financial reports for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2006. Southwest adopted EITF 06-3 on
January 1, 2007. The Company collects various excise taxes on ticket sales,
which are accounted for on a net basis.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48), which
clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as
defined. FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with
certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for
income taxes. The Company is subject to the provisions of FIN 48 as
of January 1, 2007, and has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal
and state jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as
well
as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The Company has
identified its federal tax return and its state tax returns in California and
Texas as “major” tax jurisdictions, as defined. The only periods subject to
examination for the Company’s federal return are the 2003 through 2006 tax
years. The audits of the tax years 2003 and 2004 have been completed, but are
still pending review by the Joint Committee on Taxation. The periods subject
to
examination for the Company’s state returns in California and Texas are years
2002 through 2006. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions
and
deductions will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any adjustments
that will result in a material change to its financial
position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax
positions have been recorded pursuant to FIN 48. In addition, the
Company did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption
of
FIN 48.
The
Company’s policy for recording interest and penalties associated with audits is
to record such items as a component of income before taxes. Penalties are
recorded in Other (gains) losses, net, and interest paid or received is recorded
in interest expense or interest income, respectively, in the statement of
income. For first quarter 2007, the Company recorded approximately $1 million
in
interest income related to the settlement of audits for certain prior
periods.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (Statement 159). Statement 159
allows entities the option to measure eligible financial instruments at fair
value as of specified dates. Such election, which may be applied on an
instrument by instrument basis, is typically irrevocable once elected. Statement
159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and early
application is allowed under certain circumstances. The Company has not yet
determined the impact this interpretation will have on our financial
position.
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Comparative
Consolidated Operating Statistics
Relevant
Southwest comparative operating statistics for the three months ended March
31,
2007 and 2006 are as follows:
Three
months ended March 31,
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
Change
|
||||||||
Revenue
passengers carried
|
19,960,933
|
19,199,488
|
4.0
|
%
|
||||||
Enplaned
passengers
|
22,903,073
|
22,015,484
|
4.0
|
%
|
||||||
Revenue
passenger miles (RPMs) (000s)
|
16,109,071
|
15,280,497
|
5.4
|
%
|
||||||
Available
seat miles (ASMs) (000s)
|
23,678,376
|
22,079,458
|
7.2
|
%
|
||||||
Load
factor
|
68.0
|
%
|
69.2
|
%
|
(1.2)
|
pts | ||||
Average
length of passenger haul (miles)
|
807
|
796
|
1.4
|
%
|
||||||
Average
aircraft stage length (miles)
|
627
|
617
|
1.6
|
%
|
||||||
Trips
flown
|
276,900
|
262,449
|
5.5
|
%
|
||||||
Average
passenger fare
|
|
$105.79
|
|
$100.94
|
4.8
|
%
|
||||
Passenger
revenue yield per RPM (cents)
|
13.11
|
12.68
|
3.4
|
%
|
||||||
Operating
revenue yield per ASM (cents)
|
9.28
|
9.15
|
1.4
|
%
|
||||||
Operating
expenses per ASM (cents)
|
8.93
|
8.70
|
2.6
|
%
|
||||||
Operating
expenses per ASM, excluding fuel (cents)
|
6.54
|
6.43
|
1.7
|
%
|
||||||
Fuel
costs per gallon, excluding fuel tax
|
|
$1.59
|
|
$1.51
|
5.3
|
%
|
||||
Fuel
consumed, in gallons (millions)
|
354
|
329
|
7.6
|
%
|
||||||
Fulltime
equivalent Employees at period-end
|
32,961
|
31,396
|
5.0
|
%
|
||||||
Size
of fleet at period-end
|
489
|
451
|
8.4
|
%
|
Material
Changes in Results of Operations
Summary
First
quarter 2007 represented the Company’s 64th
consecutive quarterly profit. Net income was $93 million ($.12 per share,
diluted), 52.5 percent higher than first quarter 2006, primarily due to an
increase in ineffectiveness and mark-to-market adjustments related to the
Company’s fuel derivative contracts. In first quarter 2007, forward prices for
the commodities Southwest uses for hedging jet fuel increased, resulting in
an
increase in the unrealized gains related to the higher fair values of these
contracts. Primarily as a result of these rising prices for fuel derivatives
that will settle in future periods that were ineffective, as defined, or did
not
qualify for special hedge accounting, the Company recorded $83 million in gains,
which are included in Other (gains) losses. In first quarter 2006, when
commodity prices rose by a smaller amount, the Company recorded a total of
$13
million in gains associated with fuel derivatives that were ineffective, as
defined, or did not qualify for special hedge accounting. See Note 5 and Note
1
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information on the Company’s hedging activities and for information on the
seasonal nature of the Company’s financial results. As a result of a less
favorable fuel hedge position in 2007 versus 2006, our hedging program resulted
in the realization of approximately $65 million in cash settlements for first
quarter 2007 compared to $133 million in cash settlements for first quarter
2006. Considering the ineffectiveness associated with the hedges, these 2007
settlements resulted in a reduction to Fuel and oil expense of $79 million
in
first quarter 2007. However, even with this hedge position, fuel cost per gallon
increased 5.3 percent versus first quarter 2006.
First
quarter 2007 operating income decreased $14 million, or 14.3 percent, compared
to first quarter 2006. The Company believes operating income provides a better
indication of the Company’s financial performance for first quarter 2007 and
first quarter 2006 than does net income. This is primarily due to the fact
that
the adjustments that relate to fuel derivatives expiring in future periods
are
included in Other (gains) losses, which is below the operating income line,
in
both periods. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to the fact
that operating expenses grew faster than operating revenues compared to the
prior year. Operating revenues increased 8.9 percent, primarily driven by a
9.0
percent increase in Passenger revenues. The increase in Passenger revenues
was
primarily a result of a capacity (available seat miles) increase of 7.2 percent.
RPM yields (passenger revenues divided by revenue passenger miles) improved
3.4
percent as a result of modest fare increases, partially offset by a lower load
factor (percentage of seats filled) versus the prior year. The Company believes
the lower load factor was due to inclement weather, a slowing economy, and
higher fare levels, which have all likely combined to cool the rate of growth
in
domestic air travel.
First
quarter 2007 operating expenses grew by 10.0 percent, primarily as a result
of
higher fuel expense, inclusive of hedging benefits, and higher maintenance
costs. The increase in maintenance materials and repairs resulted from more
planned airframe inspections and repairs as well as higher costs per inspection
and repair event. Despite slightly lower physical jet fuel prices, the Company
also experienced a 5.3 percent increase in fuel cost per gallon, including
the
effects of hedging, due to a less favorable hedge position versus first quarter
2006. The Company’s fuel hedges in 2007 were at higher prices than the prior
year positions. First quarter 2007 CASM (cost per available seat mile) increased
2.6 percent compared to the same prior year period. Excluding fuel, first
quarter 2007 CASM increased 1.7 percent compared to first quarter 2006,
primarily as a result of the higher maintenance costs.
Based
on
our current forecast, the Company expects second quarter 2007 capacity to grow
approximately nine percent versus second quarter 2006. However, based on current
bookings and April traffic trends to date, the Company expects a lower load
factor compared to the Company record 78.0 percent achieved in second quarter
2006. As a consequence, the Company does not expect to match second quarter
2006’s strong unit revenue (operating revenue per ASM) performance of 10.70
cents per ASM. The Company does expect, however, to experience its normal
seasonal improvement in unit revenues from first to second quarter.
Comparison
of three months ended March 31, 2007, to three months ended March 31,
2006
Revenues
Consolidated
operating revenues increased by $179 million, or 8.9 percent, primarily due
to a
$174 million, or 9.0 percent, increase in Passenger revenues. The increase
in Passenger revenues was primarily attributable to the 7.2 percent increase
in
capacity, as the Company added 38 aircraft since the end of first quarter 2006
(and
had
no aircraft retirements).
The
Company was also able to achieve a 3.4 percent increase in RPM yield primarily
from modest fare increases.
However,
this yield increase was partially offset by a lower load factor compared to
first quarter 2006. The
first
quarter 2007 load factor was 68.0 percent, compared to 69.2 percent in first
quarter 2006. Unit
revenue increased 1.4 percent, primarily due to the higher RPM yields, partially
offset by the lower load factor.
Consolidated
freight revenues decreased by $5 million, or 14.3 percent, primarily as a result
of the Company’s decision to discontinue the carrying of mail for the U.S.
Postal Service effective as of the end of second quarter 2006. Therefore, the
Company had an $8 million shortfall in mail revenues versus first quarter 2006.
This decrease was partially offset by higher freight and cargo revenues,
primarily as a result of higher rates charged. The Company also expects a
decline in consolidated freight revenues for second quarter 2007 compared to
the
level recorded in second quarter 2006, although at a lower rate than the first
quarter 2007 decline. Other revenues increased by $10 million, or 21.7 percent,
compared to first quarter 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher
commissions earned from programs the Company sponsors with certain business
partners, such as the Company sponsored Chase Visa card. The Company expects
a
year-over-year Other revenue increase in second quarter 2007 at a similar rate
than experienced in first quarter 2007.
Operating
expenses
To
a
large extent, except for the potential for large swings in market prices for
fuel, changes in operating expenses for airlines are driven by changes in
capacity, or ASMs. The following presents Southwest’s operating expenses per ASM
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, followed by explanations
of
changes on a per-ASM basis (in cents, except for percentages):
Three
months ended March 31,
|
Per
ASM
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
Change
|
Change
|
|||||||||||
Salaries,
wages, and benefits
|
3.24
|
3.24
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Fuel
and oil
|
2.38
|
2.27
|
.11
|
4.8
|
||||||||||
Maintenance
materials
|
||||||||||||||
and
repairs
|
.58
|
.47
|
.11
|
23.4
|
||||||||||
Aircraft
rentals
|
.16
|
.18
|
(.02
|
)
|
(11.1
|
)
|
||||||||
Landing
fees and other rentals
|
.58
|
.55
|
.03
|
5.5
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
|
.57
|
.56
|
.01
|
1.8
|
||||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
1.42
|
1.43
|
(.01
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)
|
||||||||
Total
|
8.93
|
8.70
|
.23
|
2.6
|
Operating expenses per ASM were 8.93 cents, a 2.6 percent increase compared
to
8.70 cents for first quarter 2006. Approximately half of the year-over-year
CASM
increase was due to higher
fuel costs, as the Company’s average cost per gallon of fuel increased 5.3
percent versus the prior year, net of hedging, and half was due to higher
maintenance materials and repairs expense. Excluding fuel, year-over-year CASM
increased 1.7 percent to 6.54 cents, almost exclusively due to the increase
in
maintenance costs. Based on current unit operating cost trends, the Company
expects second quarter 2007 unit costs, excluding fuel, to be comparable to
second quarter 2006’s 6.68 cents per ASM.
Salaries,
wages, and benefits expense per ASM was flat compared to first quarter 2006.
Higher salaries expense, primarily associated with an increase in wage rates,
was offset by lower profitsharing expense and lower share-based compensation
expense. The
Company’s profitsharing
contributions are based on income before taxes excluding primarily unrealized
gains and losses from fuel derivative contracts. Excluding these items from
first quarter of both years resulted in a 47 percent decrease in profitsharing
contributions for first quarter 2007. See Note 2 to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for further information on share-based
compensation. The Company currently expects Salaries, wages, and benefits per
ASM in second quarter 2007 to be lower than the 3.43 cents reported in second
quarter 2006, primarily due to lower profitsharing expense and lower share-based
compensation expense.
Fuel
and
oil expense per ASM increased 4.8 percent primarily due to a weaker hedge
position held by the Company in first quarter 2007 versus first quarter 2006,
partially offset by slightly lower market jet fuel prices. In first quarter
2007, the Company held fuel derivative instruments that were at higher average
crude oil-equivalent prices than in first quarter 2006. The Company’s average
fuel cost per gallon in first quarter 2007 was $1.59, 5.3 percent higher than
first quarter 2006, including the effects of hedging activities. For first
quarter 2007, the Company had protected against 100 percent of its anticipated
fuel needs at a crude oil-equivalent price of approximately $50 per barrel,
resulting in gains recorded in Fuel and oil expense of $79 million. First
quarter 2006 hedging gains recorded in Fuel and oil expense were $116
million.
For second quarter 2007, the Company has fuel derivatives in place for over
95
percent of its expected fuel consumption with a combination of derivative
instruments that effectively cap prices at approximately $50 per barrel of
crude
oil and has added refinery margins on the majority of those positions. Based
on
this protection and current market prices, the Company is hopeful its second
quarter 2007 jet fuel cost per gallon will not exceed $1.70. The majority of
the
Company's near term fuel derivatives are in the form of option contracts. At
March 31, 2007, the estimated net fair value of the Company’s fuel derivative
contracts was $1.4 billion. See Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of the Company’s hedging activities.
The Company has also continued its efforts to conserve fuel, and in 2007 has
begun installing Aviation Partners Boeing Blended Winglets on a
significant number of its 737-300 aircraft (all 737-700 aircraft have already
been equipped with winglets).
Installations on these 737-300 aircraft are expected to be completed in
2008.
Maintenance materials and repairs per ASM increased 23.4 percent compared to
first quarter 2006. The majority of the increase was a result of higher airframe
expense as the Company completed significantly more planned airframe inspection
and repair events than in the prior year. These airframe inspection events,
which are required based on the number of flight hours each individual aircraft
has flown, were higher in number as well as cost per event. This increase in
airframe maintenance is due to the maturing of the Company’s fleet as well as
the ongoing transition to a new airframe maintenance program for 737-300 and
737-500 aircraft which began in 2006. This transition is expected to have an
impact on maintenance expense for the next two to three years; however, the
Company does not expect these higher airframe costs to be a long-term trend.
The
Company currently expects Maintenance materials and repairs per ASM for second
quarter 2007 to be higher than first quarter 2007’s .58 cents per ASM primarily
due to more scheduled airframe repairs.
Aircraft
rentals per ASM decreased 11.1 percent compared to first quarter 2006. The
majority of the decrease per ASM was due to the renegotiation of several
aircraft leases over the past twelve months that resulted in lower lease rates.
The Company currently expects another year-over-year decline in Aircraft rentals
per ASM for second quarter 2007, at approximately the same level as the first
quarter 2007 decrease.
Landing
fees and other rentals per ASM increased 5.5 percent compared to first quarter
2006, primarily from an increase in other rentals per ASM. This increase was
primarily due to higher rates at certain airports and an increase in airport
space in locations in which the Company has increased the number of flights
offered. For these same reasons, the Company currently expects a similar
increase in Landing fees and other rentals per ASM in second quarter 2007
compared to second quarter 2006.
Other
operating expenses per ASM declined slightly compared to first quarter 2006’s
performance of 1.43 cents primarily due to a decrease in advertising costs.
Advertising costs were lower in first quarter 2007 primarily due to the timing
of certain advertising and promotions compared to the prior year. For second
quarter 2007, the Company expects a slight increase in Other operating expenses
per ASM compared to second quarter 2006’s 1.45 cents, primarily due to higher
advertising costs.
Through
the 2003 Emergency
Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, the federal government has continued
to
provide supplemental first-party war-risk insurance coverage to commercial
carriers for renewable 60-day periods, at substantially lower premiums than
prevailing commercial rates and for levels of coverage not available in the
commercial market. The government-provided supplemental coverage from the
Wartime Act is currently set to expire on December 31, 2007. Although another
extension beyond this date is expected, if such coverage is not extended by
the
government, the Company could incur substantially higher insurance costs in
future periods.
Other
Interest
expense decreased $5 million, or 14.7 percent, compared to first quarter 2006.
An increase in interest rates was more than offset by a lower debt balance
outstanding, and the conversion of $400 million in fixed-rate debt to floating
rates in first quarter 2007. The majority of the Company’s long-term debt is at
floating rates. See Note 5
to the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more
information.
Capitalized
interest increased $1 million, or 8.3 percent, compared to the prior year,
primarily due to a slight increase in the balances that qualify for interest
capitalization—primarily progress payments made for future aircraft deliveries.
Interest
income decreased by $5 million, or 27.8 percent, primarily due to a decrease
in
invested cash and short-term investments.
Other
(gains) losses, net, primarily includes amounts recorded in accordance with
the
Company’s hedging activities and SFAS 133. During first quarter 2007, the
Company recognized approximately $14 million of expense related to amounts
excluded from the Company's measurements of hedge effectiveness (i.e., the
premium cost of option and collar derivative contracts that settled during
first
quarter 2007). The Company expects a similar expense relating to these items
in
second quarter 2007. Also in first quarter 2007, the
Company recognized approximately $83 million of net gains in Other (gains)
losses, net, related to the ineffectiveness of its hedges and the loss of hedge
accounting for certain fuel derivatives. Of this net total, approximately $85
million was unrealized, mark-to-market gains in the fair value of certain
derivatives that will settle in future periods that no longer qualified for
special hedge accounting and $4 million was ineffectiveness and mark-to-market
gains related to contracts that settled during first quarter 2007. These were
partially offset by $6 million in losses related to unrealized ineffectiveness
from hedges designated for future periods.
See
Note 5
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more
information on the Company’s hedging activities.
In
first quarter 2006, the Company recognized approximately $11 million of expense
related to amounts excluded from the Company's measurements of hedge
effectiveness and $13 million in gains related to the ineffectiveness of its
hedges
and the
loss of hedge accounting for certain fuel derivatives.
This
$13
million consisted of approximately $40 million in gains from unrealized,
mark-to-market changes in the fair value of derivatives due to the
discontinuation of hedge accounting for certain contracts that will settle
in
future periods, partially offset by $10 million in ineffectiveness expense
and
mark-to-market losses associated with contracts that settled during first
quarter 2006, and $17 million in losses related to unrealized ineffectiveness
from hedges designated for future periods.
The
Company’s effective tax rate was 37.7 percent in first quarter 2007 compared to
36.3 percent in first quarter 2006. The
slightly higher rate in first quarter 2007 was primarily due to a lower
deduction related to disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options
from
Employee stock option exercises during first quarter 2007 versus the prior
year.
See Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The
Company currently expects its full year 2007 effective rate to be approximately
38 percent.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $617 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, compared to $751 million in the same prior year period. The
operating cash flows in both periods were largely impacted by
fluctuations in counterparty deposits associated with the Company’s fuel hedging
program. There was an increase in counterparty deposits of $345 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, versus an increase of $205 million during
the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The larger increase in these deposits during
2007 has been due to a larger increase in the fair value of the Company’s fuel
derivative portfolio versus the same prior year period. The fair value of the
Company’s fuel derivatives increased from $1.0 billion at December 31, 2006, to
$1.4 billion at March 31, 2007. Cash flows from operating activities for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, were also impacted by the $210 million
increase in Air traffic liability, as a result of seasonal bookings for future
travel. However, this was lower than the $280 million increase Air traffic
liability in first quarter 2006, thereby accounting for the majority of the
year-over-year decrease in operating cash flows. See Item 3, and Notes 5 and
7
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Net
cash
provided by operating activities is primarily used to finance capital
expenditures.
Net
cash
flows used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31,
2007,
totaled $271 million compared to $309 million in 2006. Investing activities
in
both years consisted primarily of payments for new 737-700 aircraft delivered
to
the Company and progress payments for future aircraft deliveries. In addition,
investing activities for both periods were impacted by changes in the balance
of
the Company’s short-term investments, namely auction rate securities. During the
three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company’s short-term investments
decreased by $54 million, versus an increase of $68 million during the same
prior year period.
Net
cash
used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2007,
was
$118 million compared to $122 million used in financing activities for the
same
period in 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company
repurchased $209 million of its Common Stock, representing a total of 13.5
million shares. This outflow was partially offset by $78 million received from
Employees’ exercise of stock options. In the prior year, the Company repurchased
$214 million of its Common Stock, which was partially offset by $107 million
received from Employees’ exercise of stock options.
Contractual
Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Southwest
has contractual obligations and commitments primarily for future purchases
of
aircraft, payment of debt, and lease
arrangements. Through the first three months of 2007, the Company purchased
eight new 737-700 aircraft from Boeing. Southwest’s firm orders and options to
purchase Boeing 737-700 aircraft are as follows:
The
Boeing Company
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
|
Previously
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Firm
|
Options
|
Rights
|
Owned
|
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
37
|
2
|
* |
39
|
** | |||||||||||||||
2008
|
32
|
2
|
34
|
|||||||||||||||||
2009
|
18
|
18
|
36
|
|||||||||||||||||
2010
|
10
|
32
|
42
|
|||||||||||||||||
2011
|
10
|
30
|
40
|
|||||||||||||||||
2012
|
10
|
30
|
40
|
|||||||||||||||||
2008-2014
|
- | - |
54
|
54
|
||||||||||||||||
117
|
112
|
54
|
2
|
285
|
||||||||||||||||
*Intend
to lease two previously owned 737-700 aircraft from a third
party.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
**2007
delivery dates: eight in first quarter, eleven in second quarter,
eleven
|
||||||||||||||||||||
in third quarter and nine in fourth quarter.
|
The
following table details information on the 489 aircraft in the Company’s fleet
as of March 31, 2007:
Average
|
Number
|
Number
|
Number
|
|||||||||||||
737
Type
|
Seats
|
Age
(Yrs)
|
of
Aircraft
|
Owned
|
Leased
|
|||||||||||
-300
|
137
|
15.9
|
194
|
112
|
82
|
|||||||||||
-500
|
122
|
15.9
|
25
|
16
|
9
|
|||||||||||
-700
|
137
|
4.1
|
270
|
268
|
2
|
|||||||||||
TOTALS
|
9.4
|
489
|
396
|
93
|
The
Company has the option, which must be exercised two years prior to the
contractual delivery date, to substitute -600s or -800s for the -700s. Based
on
the above delivery schedule, aggregate funding needed for firm aircraft
commitments was approximately $2.9 billion, subject to adjustments for
inflation, due as follows: $766 million remaining in 2007, $794 million in
2008,
$467 million in 2009, $341 million in 2010, $315 million in 2011, and $184
million thereafter.
The
Company has various options available to meet its capital and operating
commitments, including cash on hand and short term investments at March 31,
2007, of $1.9 billion, internally generated funds, and the Company’s fully
available $600 million revolving credit facility. The Company will also consider
various borrowing or leasing options to maximize earnings and supplement cash
requirements.
In
November 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to $400 million of the Company’s Common Stock. Repurchases were made in
accordance with applicable securities laws in the open market or in private
transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions. This program
was
completed during first quarter 2007, resulting in the repurchase of 25.6 million
shares. In March 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional
repurchase of up to $300 million of the Company’s Common Stock. As of March 31,
2007, the Company had repurchased .6 million shares for $9 million as part
of
this program. See Item 2 of Part II of this filing for further information
on
these two repurchase programs.
The
Company currently has outstanding shelf registrations for the issuance of up
to
$1.0 billion in public debt securities and pass-through certificates, which
it
may utilize for aircraft financings or other purposes in the future.
Forward
looking statements
Some
statements in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by the Company or on the
Company’s behalf from time to time in other reports, filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, news releases, conferences, World Wide Web postings
or
otherwise) which are not historical facts may be “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based
on, and include statements about, Southwest’s estimates, expectations, beliefs,
intentions, or strategies for the future, and the assumptions underlying these
forward-looking statements. Specific forward-looking statements can be
identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts and include, without limitation, statements related to the following:
our
expectations with respect to capacity, load factors, unit revenues, operating
expenses, and tax rates; our liquidity, including our anticipated needs for,
and
sources of, funds; our plans and expectations for managing exposure to material
increases in jet fuel prices; and our expectations and intentions relating
to
outstanding litigation. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual results may differ materially from what is expressed in or
indicated by Southwest’s forward-looking statements or from historical
experience or the Company’s present expectations. These factors include, among
others:
(i) |
the
price and availability of aircraft
fuel;
|
(ii) |
the
impact of governmental regulations on our operating costs, as well
as our
operations generally;
|
(iii) |
competitor
capacity and load factors; and
|
(iv) |
other
factors as set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, including the detailed factors discussed under the heading
“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
Caution
should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking
statements, which represent the Company’s views only as of the date this report
is filed. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise
any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
As
discussed in Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, the Company utilizes financial derivative instruments to hedge
its
exposure to material increases in jet fuel prices. During the first three months
of 2007, the fair values of the Company’s fuel derivative contracts increased
significantly. At March 31, 2006, the estimated gross fair value of outstanding
contracts was $1.4 billion, compared to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2006.
Outstanding
financial derivative instruments expose the Company to credit loss in the event
of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. However, the Company
does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet their obligations.
The
credit exposure related to these financial instruments is represented by the
fair value of contracts with a positive fair value at the reporting date. To
manage credit risk, the Company selects and periodically reviews counterparties
based on credit ratings, limits its exposure to a single counterparty, and
monitors the market position of the program and its relative market position
with each counterparty. At March 31, 2007, the Company had agreements with
eight
counterparties containing early termination rights and/or bilateral collateral
provisions whereby security is required if market risk exposure exceeds a
specified threshold amount or credit ratings fall below certain levels. At
March
31, 2007, the Company held $885 million in fuel derivative related cash
collateral deposits under these bilateral collateral provisions. These
collateral deposits serve to decrease, but not totally eliminate, the credit
risk associated with the Company’s hedging program. The cash deposits, which can
have a significant impact on the Company’s cash balance, are included in Accrued
liabilities on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Cash flows
as
of and for a particular operating period are included as Operating cash flows
in
the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. See also
Note 7 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
See
Item
7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Note 5
to
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information about Market Risk.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that
it
is able to collect the information it is required to disclose in the reports
it
files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to record, process,
summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in
the
rules of the SEC, including controls and procedures designed to ensure that
this
information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including its Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, as appropriate
to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation
of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report conducted by the Company’s management, with the
participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, the Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that the Company is able to collect, process,
and disclose the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files
with the SEC within the required time periods.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during
the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the
ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, examinations by
the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS regularly examines the Company’s federal
income tax returns and, in the course thereof, proposes adjustments to the
Company’s federal income tax liability reported on such returns. It is the
Company’s practice to vigorously contest those proposed adjustments it deems
lacking of merit.
The
Company's management does not expect that the outcome in any of its currently
ongoing legal proceedings or the outcome of any proposed adjustments presented
to date by the IRS, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash
flow.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
||||||||||
Total
number of
|
Maximum
dollar
|
||||||||||||
shares
purchased
|
value
of shares that
|
||||||||||||
Total
number
|
Average
|
as
part of publicly
|
may
yet be purchased
|
||||||||||
of
shares
|
price
paid
|
announced
plans
|
under
the plans
|
||||||||||
Period
|
purchased
|
per
share
|
or
programs
|
or
programs
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
January
1, 2007 through
January
31, 2007
|
4,200,000
|
$
|
15.72
|
4,200,000
|
$
|
133,723,357
|
|||||||
February
1, 2007 through February 28, 2007
|
5,700,000
|
$
|
15.44
|
5,700,000
|
$
|
45,715,357
|
|||||||
March
1, 2007 through March 31, 2007
|
3,632,600
|
$
|
15.11
|
3,632,600
|
$
|
290,826,771
|
|||||||
Total
|
13,532,600
|
13,532,600
|
(1)
On
November 16, 2006, the Company publicly announced a program for the repurchase
of up to $400 million of the Company’s Common Stock. This program was completed
during March 2007, resulting in the purchase of 25.6 million shares. On March
15, 2007, the Company publicly announced an additional program for the
repurchase of up to $300 million of the Company’s Common Stock. As of March 31,
2007, the Company had repurchased .6 million shares for $9 million as part
of
this program. Repurchases for both programs have been made in accordance with
applicable securities laws in the open market or in private transactions from
time to time, depending on market conditions.
Item
3. Defaults
upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item
5. Other
Information
None
Item
6. Exhibits
a) Exhibits
3.1
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation of Southwest (incorporated by reference
to
|
|
Exhibit 4.1
to Southwest’s Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File
|
||
No. 33-52155));
Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Southwest
|
||
(incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Southwest’s Quarterly Report on
|
||
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1996 (File
No. 1-7259));
|
||
Amendment
to Restated Articles of Incorporation of Southwest (incorporated
by
|
||
reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Southwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the
|
||
quarter
ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-7259)); Amendment to Restated
Articles of
|
||
Incorporation
of Southwest (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Southwest’s
|
||
Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82735);
|
||
Amendment
to Restated Articles of Incorporation of Southwest (incorporated
by
|
||
reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Southwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the
|
||
quarter
ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 1-7259)).
|
||
3.2
|
Bylaws
of Southwest, as amended through January 2007 (incorporated by reference
|
|
to
Exhibit 3.2 to Southwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 18, 2007).
|
||
10.1
|
Supplemental
Agreement No. 52 to Purchase Agreement No. 1810,
|
|
dated
January 19, 1994 between The Boeing Company and
Southwest.
|
||
Pursuant
to 17 CFR 240.24b-2, confidential information has been
omitted
|
||
and
has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission
|
||
pursuant
to a Confidential Treatment Application filed with the
|
||
Commission.
|
||
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial
|
|
Officer
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
SOUTHWEST
AIRLINES CO.
|
|
April
20, 2007
|
By
|
/s/
Laura H. Wright
|
Laura
H. Wright
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
(On
behalf of the Registrant and in
|
||
her
capacity as Principal Financial
|
||
and
Accounting Officer)
|
||
EXHIBIT
INDEX
3.1
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation of Southwest (incorporated by reference
to
|
|
Exhibit 4.1
to Southwest’s Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File
|
||
No. 33-52155));
Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Southwest
|
||
(incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Southwest’s Quarterly Report on
|
||
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1996 (File
No. 1-7259));
|
||
Amendment
to Restated Articles of Incorporation of Southwest (incorporated
by
|
||
reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Southwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the
|
||
quarter
ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-7259)); Amendment to Restated
Articles of
|
||
Incorporation
of Southwest (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Southwest’s
|
||
Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82735);
|
||
Amendment
to Restated Articles of Incorporation of Southwest (incorporated
by
|
||
reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Southwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the
|
||
quarter
ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 1-7259)).
|
||
3.2
|
Bylaws
of Southwest, as amended through January 2007 (incorporated by reference
|
|
to
Exhibit 3.2 to Southwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 18, 2007).
|
||
Supplemental
Agreement No. 52 to Purchase Agreement No. 1810,
|
||
dated
January 19, 1994 between The Boeing Company and
Southwest.
|
||
Pursuant
to 17 CFR 240.24b-2, confidential information has been
omitted
|
||
and
has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission
|
||
pursuant
to a Confidential Treatment Application filed with the
|
||
Commission.
|
||
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Section
1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial
|
||
Officer
|